Re: [PATCH v3] drivers: ddcci: upstream DDCCI driver

From: Randy Dunlap
Date: Thu Mar 10 2022 - 00:19:34 EST




On 3/9/22 21:01, Yusuf Khan wrote:
> Thanks for the feedback!
>
> (2) Where would I place that documentation then,
> documentation/devicetree/bindings/?

I like the way that you have all the info in one place, but the
current way Documentation is organized has /sysfs interfaces in
Documentation/ABI/. Then I would put the rest of the doc info in
Documentation/driver-api/ddcci.rst.

> (4) A quick look at bootlin shows a symbol called
> "modalias referenced 176 times.
>

Well, bootlin is not a kernel driver.
I see places in generic ACPI or generic (other) firmware code
or SPI bus working with modalias strings. Maybe it's OK --
just seems odd to me.

>
> On Wed, Mar 9, 2022 at 6:49 PM Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>
>> Hi--
>>
>> On 3/9/22 16:44, Yusuf Khan wrote:
>>> diff --git a/drivers/char/Kconfig b/drivers/char/Kconfig
>>> index 740811893c57..c7aa439d23e7 100644
>>> --- a/drivers/char/Kconfig
>>> +++ b/drivers/char/Kconfig
>>> @@ -451,4 +451,13 @@ config RANDOM_TRUST_BOOTLOADER
>>> pool. Otherwise, say N here so it will be regarded as device input that
>>> only mixes the entropy pool.
>>>
>>> +config DDCCI
>>> + tristate "DDCCI display protocol support"
>>> + help
>>> + Display Data Channel Command Interface is a
>>
>> is an
>>
>> Also, the line above ends with a space. Please check the entire patch
>> for lines that end with SPACE and remove the trailing spaces.
>>
>>> + interface that allows the kernel to "talk"
>>> + to most displays made after 2005. Check your
>>> + display's specification to see if it has
>>> + support for this.
>>> +
>>> endmenu
>>
>> (2) ddcci appears to be a char driver, not a misc driver,
>> so its documentation probably should not be in Documentation/misc-devices/.
>>
>> (3) The documentation file ends with:
>>
>> +options ddcci dyndbg
>> +options ddcci-backlight dyndbg
>> \ No newline at end of file
>>
>> so please add a newline at the end of the last line.
>>
>> (4) What is the modalias stuff about?
>> Does the kernel have other drivers that play modalias games
>> like this?
>>
>>
>> (5) This standalone comment might need some more text.
>> Doesn't make much sense by itself.
>>
>> + /* Special case: sender to 0x6E is always 0x51 */
>>
>> Does that mean something like "reply to 0x6E is always 0x51" ?
>>
>>
>> (6) Be a bit more generous with spaces around operators (kernel style).
>> And be consistent. This first line is OK, second line not so much.
>>
>> + xor ^= ((p_flag << 7) | len);
>> + *(ptr++) = (p_flag << 7)|len;
>>
>> This line could also be improved with some spaces:
>>
>> + ret = payload_len+3+((quirks & DDCCI_QUIRK_SKIP_FIRST_BYTE)?1:0);
>>
>> (e.g. -- I expect that there are others.)
>>
>>
>> (7) Too much use of likely() and unlikely().
>>
>> (8) I don't see anything in the Kconfig entries such as
>> depends on I2C
>>
>> so do these 2 drivers work without I2C being enabled in a kernel?
>>
>> Oh, if I build ddcci without CONFIG_I2C:
>>
>> ../drivers/char/ddcci.c: In function ‘__ddcci_write_bytewise’:
>> ../drivers/char/ddcci.c:104:8: error: implicit declaration of function ‘i2c_smbus_write_byte’ [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]
>> ret = i2c_smbus_write_byte(client, addr);
>> ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
>> CC kernel/delayacct.o
>> ../drivers/char/ddcci.c: In function ‘__ddcci_write_block’:
>> ../drivers/char/ddcci.c:165:9: error: implicit declaration of function ‘i2c_master_send’; did you mean ‘i2c_match_id’? [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]
>> return i2c_master_send(client, sendbuf, ptr - sendbuf + 1);
>> ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
>> i2c_match_id
>> ../drivers/char/ddcci.c: In function ‘__ddcci_read’:
>> ../drivers/char/ddcci.c:216:8: error: implicit declaration of function ‘i2c_master_recv’; did you mean ‘i2c_match_id’? [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]
>> ret = i2c_master_recv(client, buf, len);
>> ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
>> i2c_match_id
>> ../drivers/char/ddcci.c: In function ‘ddcci_identify_device’:
>> ../drivers/char/ddcci.c:413:10: error: implicit declaration of function ‘i2c_check_functionality’; did you mean ‘in_lock_functions’? [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]
>> && i2c_check_functionality(client->adapter,
>> ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
>> in_lock_functions
>> ../drivers/char/ddcci.c: In function ‘ddcci_module_init’:
>> ../drivers/char/ddcci.c:1835:8: error: implicit declaration of function ‘i2c_add_driver’; did you mean ‘ddcci_add_driver’? [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]
>> ret = i2c_add_driver(&ddcci_driver);
>> ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~
>> ddcci_add_driver
>> ../drivers/char/ddcci.c: In function ‘ddcci_module_exit’:
>> ../drivers/char/ddcci.c:1868:2: error: implicit declaration of function ‘i2c_del_driver’; did you mean ‘ddcci_del_driver’? [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]
>> i2c_del_driver(&ddcci_driver);
>> ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~
>> ddcci_del_driver
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> ~Randy

--
~Randy