Re: [PATCH 3/3] dt-bindings: i2c: at91: Add SAMA7G5 compatible strings list

From: Krzysztof Kozlowski
Date: Thu Mar 10 2022 - 06:05:23 EST


On 10/03/2022 11:42, Sergiu.Moga@xxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote:
> On 10.03.2022 09:22, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
>> On 09/03/2022 13:07, Sergiu Moga wrote:
>>> Add compatible strings list for SAMA7G5.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Sergiu Moga <sergiu.moga@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>>> ---
>>> .../bindings/i2c/atmel,at91sam-i2c.yaml | 38 ++++++++++++-------
>>> 1 file changed, 24 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/i2c/atmel,at91sam-i2c.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/i2c/atmel,at91sam-i2c.yaml
>>> index d4aadbbd1a11..661a679b98cf 100644
>>> --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/i2c/atmel,at91sam-i2c.yaml
>>> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/i2c/atmel,at91sam-i2c.yaml
>>> @@ -16,10 +16,15 @@ allOf:
>>> properties:
>>> compatible:
>>> contains:
>>> - enum:
>>> - - atmel,sama5d4-i2c
>>> - - atmel,sama5d2-i2c
>>> - - microchip,sam9x60-i2c
>>> + oneOf:
>>> + - items:
>>> + - enum:
>>> + - atmel,sama5d4-i2c
>>> + - atmel,sama5d2-i2c
>>> + - microchip,sam9x60-i2c
>>> + - items:
>>> + - const: microchip,sama7g5-i2c
>>> + - const: microchip,sam9x60-i2c
>> This looks not needed, because it contains microchip,sam9x60-i2c which
>> is mentioned earlier.
>>
> Hmm, I might have misunderstood the functionality. I thought it would be
> stricter, having to match all the strings of that compatible. I guess
> something like this should be enough then?
>            oneOf:
>               - enum:
>                   - atmel,sama5d4-i2c
>                   - atmel,sama5d2-i2c
>                   - microchip,sam9x60-i2c
>                   - microchip,sama7g5-i2
>
> Just adding the sama7g5 compatible seems to pass the check on my end.

Yes, that is also a good solution.

Best regards,
Krzysztof