Re: [PATCH] HMM selftests changes

From: Alistair Popple
Date: Thu Mar 10 2022 - 07:02:05 EST

Next message: Jiyong Park: "Re: [PATCH] vhost/vsock: reset only the h2g connections upon release"
Previous message: Chengming Zhou: "Re: [Phishing Risk] [External] Re: [RFC PATCH] perf/core: fix cpuctx cgrp warning"
In reply to: Mika Penttilä: "Re: [PATCH] HMM selftests changes"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

Mika Penttilä <mpenttil@xxxxxxxxxx> writes:

> On 10.3.2022 5.44, John Hubbard wrote:
>> On 3/8/22 5:10 AM, Vlastimil Babka wrote:
>>> +CC relevant folks
>>>
>>> On 3/8/22 02:57, mpenttil@xxxxxxxxxx wrote:
>>>> From: Mika Penttilä <mpenttil@xxxxxxxxxx>
>> Hi Mika,
>> This looks like a very nice cleanup and simplification, delighted to see
>> it!

Agreed, thanks for doing this.

> Thanks!
>
>> In fact, I like it so much that I've got a bunch of fussy nitpicks I'm
>> hoping you'll consider applying, below. :)
>> Also, I'm assuming you've tested it a little bit? (My test rig is boxed
>> up for another day or two, don't ask...haha.)
>>
>
> Yes it passed the tests with the changes.

Feel free to add:

Tested-by: Alistair Popple <apopple@xxxxxxxxxx>

It does currently conflict with linux-next due to the changes for device
coherent memory. So if that series ends up going in first this will need a
little bit of rework. It should be fairly straight forward though - the main
difference is that series introduces two new extra minor nodes.

- Alistair

>
>
>>>>
>>>> HMM selftests use a in-kernel pseudo device to emulate device private memory.
>>>>
>>>> For now, the pseudo device registers a major device range for two pseudo device instances.
>>>> User space has a script that goes figures out from /proc/devices the assigned major
>>>> and mknods the device nodes.
>>>>
>>>> Change this use to a more standard device framework, like misc device,
>>>> which makes the device node names to appear right under any decent user space.
>>>> This also makes it possible for udev- like processing if wanted,
>>>> and the /proc/devices parsing is not needed any more.
>> How about this for the subject line and body? I've made the subject line
>> match what other commits look like in this area, and I've clarified the
>> wording in the body:
>>
>> mm/hmm/test: simplify hmm test code: use miscdevice instead of char dev
>> HMM selftests use an in-kernel pseudo device to emulate device private
>> memory. The pseudo device registers a major device range for two pseudo
>> device instances. User space has a script that reads /proc/devices in
>> order to find the assigned major number, and sends that to mknod(1),
>> once for each node.
>> This duplicates a fair amount of boilerplate that misc device can do
>> instead.
>> Change this to use misc device, which makes the device node names appear
>> for us. This also enables udev-like processing if desired.
>> Delete the /proc/devices parsing from the user-space test script, now
>> that it is unnecessary.
>>
>>>>
>>>> Signed-off-by: Mika Penttilä <mpenttil@xxxxxxxxxx>
>>>> ---
>>>> lib/test_hmm.c | 46 +++++++++++++++-----------
>>>> tools/testing/selftests/vm/test_hmm.sh | 6 ----
>>>> 2 files changed, 26 insertions(+), 26 deletions(-)
>>>>
>>>> diff --git a/lib/test_hmm.c b/lib/test_hmm.c
>>>> index 767538089a62..76f6129e1f1f 100644
>>>> --- a/lib/test_hmm.c
>>>> +++ b/lib/test_hmm.c
>>>> @@ -10,7 +10,6 @@
>>>> #include <linux/mm.h>
>>>> #include <linux/module.h>
>>>> #include <linux/kernel.h>
>>>> -#include <linux/cdev.h>
>>>> #include <linux/device.h>
>>>> #include <linux/mutex.h>
>>>> #include <linux/rwsem.h>
>>>> @@ -25,18 +24,25 @@
>>>> #include <linux/swapops.h>
>>>> #include <linux/sched/mm.h>
>>>> #include <linux/platform_device.h>
>>>> +#include <linux/miscdevice.h>
>>>> #include <linux/rmap.h>
>>>> #include "test_hmm_uapi.h"
>>>> -#define DMIRROR_NDEVICES 2
>>>> #define DMIRROR_RANGE_FAULT_TIMEOUT 1000
>>>> #define DEVMEM_CHUNK_SIZE (256 * 1024 * 1024U)
>>>> #define DEVMEM_CHUNKS_RESERVE 16
>>>> +
>> Extra newline, please delete.
>>
>
> yep
>
>
>>>> +static const char *dmirror_device_names[] = {
>>>> + "hmm_dmirror0",
>>>> + "hmm_dmirror1"
>>>> +};
>>>> +
>>>> +#define DMIRROR_NDEVICES ARRAY_SIZE(dmirror_device_names)
>>>> +
>>>> static const struct dev_pagemap_ops dmirror_devmem_ops;
>>>> static const struct mmu_interval_notifier_ops dmirror_min_ops;
>>>> -static dev_t dmirror_dev;
>>>> struct dmirror_device;
>>>> @@ -82,7 +88,7 @@ struct dmirror_chunk {
>>>> * Per device data.
>>>> */
>>>> struct dmirror_device {
>>>> - struct cdev cdevice;
>>>> + struct miscdevice miscdevice;
>>>> struct hmm_devmem *devmem;
>>>> unsigned int devmem_capacity;
>>>> @@ -118,16 +124,20 @@ static void dmirror_bounce_fini(struct dmirror_bounce *bounce)
>>>> static int dmirror_fops_open(struct inode *inode, struct file *filp)
>>>> {
>>>> - struct cdev *cdev = inode->i_cdev;
>>>> +
>>>> + struct dmirror_device *dd = container_of(filp->private_data,
>>>> + struct dmirror_device, miscdevice
>>>> + );
>> Let's delete that whole chunk, because the variable is unnecessary, and
>> is adding to the line count and mental load for no reason.
>
>
> Agreed.
>
>
>> Look how much cleaner this it gets after applying this incremental diff
>> on top of your patch:
>> diff --git a/lib/test_hmm.c b/lib/test_hmm.c
>> index 76f6129e1f1f..3ec8ca8059cd 100644
>> --- a/lib/test_hmm.c
>> +++ b/lib/test_hmm.c
>> @@ -125,19 +125,16 @@ static void dmirror_bounce_fini(struct dmirror_bounce *bounce)
>> static int dmirror_fops_open(struct inode *inode, struct file *filp)
>> {
>> - struct dmirror_device *dd = container_of(filp->private_data,
>> - struct dmirror_device, miscdevice
>> - );
>> struct dmirror *dmirror;
>> int ret;
>> -
>> /* Mirror this process address space */
>> dmirror = kzalloc(sizeof(*dmirror), GFP_KERNEL);
>> if (dmirror == NULL)
>> return -ENOMEM;
>> - dmirror->mdevice = dd;
>> + dmirror->mdevice = container_of(filp->private_data,struct dmirror_device,
>> + miscdevice);
>> mutex_init(&dmirror->mutex);
>> xa_init(&dmirror->pt);
>>
>>>> struct dmirror *dmirror;
>>>> int ret;
>>>> +
>>>> /* Mirror this process address space */
>>>> dmirror = kzalloc(sizeof(*dmirror), GFP_KERNEL);
>>>> if (dmirror `= NULL)
>>>> return -ENOMEM;
>>>> - dmirror->mdevice = container_of(cdev, struct dmirror_device, cdevice);
>>>> + dmirror->mdevice = dd;
>>>> mutex_init(&dmirror->mutex);
>>>> xa_init(&dmirror->pt);
>>>> @@ -1216,16 +1226,18 @@ static const struct dev_pagemap_ops
>>>> dmirror_devmem_ops = {
>>>> static int dmirror_device_init(struct dmirror_device *mdevice, int id)
>>>> {
>>>> - dev_t dev;
>>>> +
>>>> int ret;
>>>> - dev = MKDEV(MAJOR(dmirror_dev), id);
>>>> mutex_init(&mdevice->devmem_lock);
>>>> spin_lock_init(&mdevice->lock);
>>>> - cdev_init(&mdevice->cdevice, &dmirror_fops);
>>>> - mdevice->cdevice.owner = THIS_MODULE;
>>>> - ret = cdev_add(&mdevice->cdevice, dev, 1);
>>>> + mdevice->miscdevice.minor = MISC_DYNAMIC_MINOR;
>>>> + mdevice->miscdevice.name = dmirror_device_names[id];
>>>> + mdevice->miscdevice.fops = &dmirror_fops;
>>>> +
>>>> + ret = misc_register(&mdevice->miscdevice);
>>>> +
>>>> if (ret)
>>>> return ret;
>>>> @@ -1252,7 +1264,7 @@ static void dmirror_device_remove(struct
>>>> dmirror_device *mdevice)
>>>> kfree(mdevice->devmem_chunks);
>>>> }
>>>> - cdev_del(&mdevice->cdevice);
>>>> + misc_deregister(&mdevice->miscdevice);
>>>> }
>>>> static int __init hmm_dmirror_init(void)
>>>> @@ -1260,11 +1272,6 @@ static int __init hmm_dmirror_init(void)
>>>> int ret;
>>>> int id;
>>>> - ret = alloc_chrdev_region(&dmirror_dev, 0, DMIRROR_NDEVICES,
>>>> - "HMM_DMIRROR");
>>>> - if (ret)
>>>> - goto err_unreg;
>>>> -
>>>> for (id = 0; id < DMIRROR_NDEVICES; id++) {
>>>> ret = dmirror_device_init(dmirror_devices + id, id);
>>>> if (ret)
>>>> @@ -1277,8 +1284,7 @@ static int __init hmm_dmirror_init(void)
>>>> err_chrdev:
>>>> while (--id >' 0)
>>>> dmirror_device_remove(dmirror_devices + id);
>>>> - unregister_chrdev_region(dmirror_dev, DMIRROR_NDEVICES);
>>>> -err_unreg:
>>>> +
>>>> return ret;
>>>> }
>>>> @@ -1288,7 +1294,7 @@ static void __exit hmm_dmirror_exit(void)
>>>> for (id = 0; id < DMIRROR_NDEVICES; id++)
>>>> dmirror_device_remove(dmirror_devices + id);
>>>> - unregister_chrdev_region(dmirror_dev, DMIRROR_NDEVICES);
>>>> +
>> Another extra newline, please delete it.
>
> yes
>
>>
>>>> }
>>>> module_init(hmm_dmirror_init);
>>>> diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/vm/test_hmm.sh b/tools/testing/selftests/vm/test_hmm.sh
>>>> index 0647b525a625..69f5889f8575 100755
>>>> --- a/tools/testing/selftests/vm/test_hmm.sh
>>>> +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/vm/test_hmm.sh
>>>> @@ -41,17 +41,11 @@ check_test_requirements()
>>>> load_driver()
>>>> {
>>>> modprobe $DRIVER > /dev/null 2>&1
>>>> - if [ $? == 0 ]; then
>>>> - major=$(awk "\$2==\"HMM_DMIRROR\" {print \$1}" /proc/devices)
>>>> - mknod /dev/hmm_dmirror0 c $major 0
>>>> - mknod /dev/hmm_dmirror1 c $major 1
>>>> - fi
>>>> }
>>>> unload_driver()
>>>> {
>>>> modprobe -r $DRIVER > /dev/null 2>&1
>>>> - rm -f /dev/hmm_dmirror?
>> Nice!
>>
>>>> }
>>>> run_smoke()
>>>
>> thanks,
>
>
>
> Ok will make the changes and repost,
>
> thanks!
>
> --Mika

Next message: Jiyong Park: "Re: [PATCH] vhost/vsock: reset only the h2g connections upon release"
Previous message: Chengming Zhou: "Re: [Phishing Risk] [External] Re: [RFC PATCH] perf/core: fix cpuctx cgrp warning"
In reply to: Mika Penttilä: "Re: [PATCH] HMM selftests changes"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]