Re: [PATCH 1/5] x86/alternative: simplify DUMP_BYTES macro

From: Joe Perches
Date: Sat Mar 12 2022 - 11:36:21 EST


On Fri, 2022-03-11 at 17:43 +0300, Alexey Dobriyan wrote:
> Avoid zero length check with clever whitespace placement in the format
> string.
[]
> diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/alternative.c b/arch/x86/kernel/alternative.c
[]
> @@ -66,13 +66,10 @@ do { \
> if (unlikely(debug_alternative)) { \
> int j; \
> \
> - if (!(len)) \
> - break; \
> - \
> printk(KERN_DEBUG pr_fmt(fmt), ##args); \
> - for (j = 0; j < (len) - 1; j++) \
> - printk(KERN_CONT "%02hhx ", buf[j]); \
> - printk(KERN_CONT "%02hhx\n", buf[j]); \
> + for (j = 0; j < (len); j++) \
> + printk(KERN_CONT " %02hhx", buf[j]); \
> + printk(KERN_CONT "\n"); \
> } \

This could also use %02x and not %02hhx

And MAX_PATCH_LEN is 255 but is that really possible?

Maybe if the actual patch length is always <= 64 this could use
printk(KERN_CONT "%*ph\n", (int)len, buf);
instead and avoid all possible interleaving?

If so, maybe just remove DUMP_BYTES and use DPRINTK directly.

Perhaps:
---
arch/x86/kernel/alternative.c | 31 ++++++++++---------------------
1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 21 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/alternative.c b/arch/x86/kernel/alternative.c
index 018b61febf0e7..74fa946093467 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/alternative.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/alternative.c
@@ -61,21 +61,6 @@ do { \
printk(KERN_DEBUG pr_fmt(fmt) "\n", ##args); \
} while (0)

-#define DUMP_BYTES(buf, len, fmt, args...) \
-do { \
- if (unlikely(debug_alternative)) { \
- int j; \
- \
- if (!(len)) \
- break; \
- \
- printk(KERN_DEBUG pr_fmt(fmt), ##args); \
- for (j = 0; j < (len) - 1; j++) \
- printk(KERN_CONT "%02hhx ", buf[j]); \
- printk(KERN_CONT "%02hhx\n", buf[j]); \
- } \
-} while (0)
-
static const unsigned char x86nops[] =
{
BYTES_NOP1,
@@ -214,7 +199,8 @@ static __always_inline int optimize_nops_range(u8 *instr, u8 instrlen, int off)
add_nops(instr + off, nnops);
local_irq_restore(flags);

- DUMP_BYTES(instr, instrlen, "%px: [%d:%d) optimized NOPs: ", instr, off, i);
+ DPRINTK("%px: [%d:%d) optimized NOPs: %*ph",
+ instr, off, i, (int)instrlen, instr);

return nnops;
}
@@ -303,8 +289,10 @@ void __init_or_module noinline apply_alternatives(struct alt_instr *start,
instr, instr, a->instrlen,
replacement, a->replacementlen);

- DUMP_BYTES(instr, a->instrlen, "%px: old_insn: ", instr);
- DUMP_BYTES(replacement, a->replacementlen, "%px: rpl_insn: ", replacement);
+ DPRINTK("%px: old_insn: %*ph",
+ instr, (int)a->instrlen, instr);
+ DPRINTK("%px: rpl_insn: %*ph",
+ replacement, (int)a->replacementlen, replacement);

memcpy(insn_buff, replacement, a->replacementlen);
insn_buff_sz = a->replacementlen;
@@ -328,7 +316,8 @@ void __init_or_module noinline apply_alternatives(struct alt_instr *start,
for (; insn_buff_sz < a->instrlen; insn_buff_sz++)
insn_buff[insn_buff_sz] = 0x90;

- DUMP_BYTES(insn_buff, insn_buff_sz, "%px: final_insn: ", instr);
+ DPRINTK("%px: final_insn: %*ph",
+ instr, (int)insn_buff_sz, insn_buff);

text_poke_early(instr, insn_buff, insn_buff_sz);

@@ -499,8 +488,8 @@ void __init_or_module noinline apply_retpolines(s32 *start, s32 *end)
len = patch_retpoline(addr, &insn, bytes);
if (len == insn.length) {
optimize_nops(bytes, len);
- DUMP_BYTES(((u8*)addr), len, "%px: orig: ", addr);
- DUMP_BYTES(((u8*)bytes), len, "%px: repl: ", addr);
+ DPRINTK("%px: orig: %*ph", addr, (int)len, addr);
+ DPRINTK("%px: repl: %*ph", addr, (int)len, bytes);
text_poke_early(addr, bytes, len);
}
}