On 3/10/22 18:39, Andrew Morton wrote:Yes, end users also use this, especially on large systems, might want
On Thu, 10 Mar 2022 13:07:49 +0100 Oscar Salvador <osalvador@xxxxxxx> wrote:I asked Abhishek about this a bit here:
We do already have two CPU callbacks (vmstat_cpu_online() and vmstat_cpu_dead())What I'm not getting here (as so often happens) is a sense of how badly
that check exactly that, so get rid of the CPU callbacks in
migrate_on_reclaim_init() and only call set_migration_target_nodes() from
vmstat_cpu_{dead,online}() whenever a numa node change its N_CPU state.
this affects our users. Does anyone actually hotplug frequently enough
to care?
https://lore.kernel.org/all/4e8067e1-0574-c9d2-9d6c-d676d32071bd@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx/It sounded to me like there are ppc users who convert their systems from
SMT=1 to SMT=8. I'd guess that they want to do this as a side-channel
mitigation because ppc has been dealing with the same basic issues as
those of us over in x86 land. The increase in time (20s->36s) would be
noticeable and probably slightly annoying to a human waiting on it.
I'd love to hear more details on this from Abhishek, like whether end
users do this as opposed to IBM's kernel developers. But, it does sound
deserving of a stable@ tag to me.