Re: [PATCH 2/3] preempt/dynamic: Introduce preempt mode accessors

From: Peter Zijlstra
Date: Tue Mar 15 2022 - 06:49:24 EST

Next message: John Garry: "[PATCH 0/2] scsi/libata: A potential tagging fix and improvement"
Previous message: David Hildenbrand: "[PATCH v2 01/15] mm/rmap: fix missing swap_free() in try_to_unmap() after arch_unmap_one() failed"
In reply to: Frederic Weisbecker: "Re: [PATCH 2/3] preempt/dynamic: Introduce preempt mode accessors"
Next in thread: Paul E. McKenney: "Re: [PATCH 2/3] preempt/dynamic: Introduce preempt mode accessors"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

On Mon, Mar 14, 2022 at 03:44:39PM +0100, Marco Elver wrote:
> https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20211112185203.280040-3-valentin.schneider@xxxxxxx/
>
> Is it also possible to take all the rest of that series (all 4
> patches) from Valentin?

I'll go stick the remaining 3 patches from Valentin in sched/core, they
seem to still apply without issue.

Next message: John Garry: "[PATCH 0/2] scsi/libata: A potential tagging fix and improvement"
Previous message: David Hildenbrand: "[PATCH v2 01/15] mm/rmap: fix missing swap_free() in try_to_unmap() after arch_unmap_one() failed"
In reply to: Frederic Weisbecker: "Re: [PATCH 2/3] preempt/dynamic: Introduce preempt mode accessors"
Next in thread: Paul E. McKenney: "Re: [PATCH 2/3] preempt/dynamic: Introduce preempt mode accessors"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]