Re: [PATCH 2/3] spi: tegra210-quad: Add wait polling support

[Jon Hunter]

On 17/03/2022 01:20, Krishna Yarlagadda wrote:
> Controller can poll for wait state inserted by TPM device and
> handle it.
>
> Signed-off-by: Krishna Yarlagadda <kyarlagadda@xxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
>   drivers/spi/spi-tegra210-quad.c | 31 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>   1 file changed, 31 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/spi/spi-tegra210-quad.c b/drivers/spi/spi-tegra210-quad.c
> index a2e225e8f7f0..ecf171bfcdce 100644
> --- a/drivers/spi/spi-tegra210-quad.c
> +++ b/drivers/spi/spi-tegra210-quad.c
> @@ -142,6 +142,7 @@
>   
>   #define QSPI_GLOBAL_CONFIG			0X1a4
>   #define QSPI_CMB_SEQ_EN				BIT(0)
> +#define QSPI_TPM_WAIT_POLL_EN			BIT(1)
>   
>   #define QSPI_CMB_SEQ_ADDR			0x1a8
>   #define QSPI_ADDRESS_VALUE_SET(X)		(((x) & 0xFFFF) << 0)
> @@ -165,11 +166,13 @@ struct tegra_qspi_soc_data {
>   	bool has_dma;
>   	bool cmb_xfer_capable;
>   	bool cs_count;
> +	bool has_wait_polling;
>   };
>   
>   struct tegra_qspi_client_data {
>   	int tx_clk_tap_delay;
>   	int rx_clk_tap_delay;
> +	bool wait_polling;
>   };
>   
>   struct tegra_qspi {
> @@ -833,6 +836,11 @@ static u32 tegra_qspi_setup_transfer_one(struct spi_device *spi, struct spi_tran
>   		else
>   			command1 |= QSPI_CONTROL_MODE_0;
>   
> +		if (tqspi->soc_data->cmb_xfer_capable)
> +			command1 &= ~QSPI_CS_SW_HW;
> +		else
> +			command1 |= QSPI_CS_SW_HW;
> +
>   		if (spi->mode & SPI_CS_HIGH)
>   			command1 |= QSPI_CS_SW_VAL;
>   		else
> @@ -917,6 +925,7 @@ static int tegra_qspi_start_transfer_one(struct spi_device *spi,
>   
>   static struct tegra_qspi_client_data *tegra_qspi_parse_cdata_dt(struct spi_device *spi)
>   {
> +	struct tegra_qspi *tqspi = spi_master_get_devdata(spi->master);
>   	struct tegra_qspi_client_data *cdata;
>   
>   	cdata = devm_kzalloc(&spi->dev, sizeof(*cdata), GFP_KERNEL);
> @@ -927,6 +936,11 @@ static struct tegra_qspi_client_data *tegra_qspi_parse_cdata_dt(struct spi_devic
>   				 &cdata->tx_clk_tap_delay);
>   	device_property_read_u32(&spi->dev, "nvidia,rx-clk-tap-delay",
>   				 &cdata->rx_clk_tap_delay);
> +	if (tqspi->soc_data->has_wait_polling)
> +		cdata->wait_polling = device_property_read_bool
> +					(&spi->dev,
> +					 "nvidia,wait-polling");
> +


This looks odd. Why do we need this device-tree property if it is 
already specified in the SoC data?

Jon

--
nvpublic