Re: [PATCH v1 4/7] arm64/pgtable: support __HAVE_ARCH_PTE_SWP_EXCLUSIVE

[Catalin Marinas]

On Thu, Mar 17, 2022 at 11:04:18AM +0100, David Hildenbrand wrote:
> On 16.03.22 19:27, Catalin Marinas wrote:
> > On Tue, Mar 15, 2022 at 03:18:34PM +0100, David Hildenbrand wrote:
> >> @@ -909,12 +925,13 @@ static inline pmd_t pmdp_establish(struct vm_area_struct *vma,
> >>  /*
> >>   * Encode and decode a swap entry:
> >>   *	bits 0-1:	present (must be zero)
> >> - *	bits 2-7:	swap type
> >> + *	bits 2:		remember PG_anon_exclusive
> >> + *	bits 3-7:	swap type
> >>   *	bits 8-57:	swap offset
> >>   *	bit  58:	PTE_PROT_NONE (must be zero)
> > 
> > I don't remember exactly why we reserved bits 0 and 1 when, from the
> > hardware perspective, it's sufficient for bit 0 to be 0 and the whole
> > pte becomes invalid. We use bit 1 as the 'table' bit (when 0 at pmd
> > level, it's a huge page) but we shouldn't check for this on a swap
> > entry.
> 
> You mean
> 
> arch/arm64/include/asm/pgtable-hwdef.h:#define PTE_TABLE_BIT            (_AT(pteval_t, 1) << 1)
> 
> right?

Yes.

> I wonder why it even exists, for arm64 I only spot:
> 
> arch/arm64/include/asm/pgtable.h:#define pte_mkhuge(pte)                (__pte(pte_val(pte) & ~PTE_TABLE_BIT))
> 
> I don't really see code that sets PTE_TABLE_BIT.
> 
> Similarly, I don't see code that sets PMD_TABLE_BIT/PUD_TABLE_BIT/P4D_TABLE_BIT.
> Most probably setting code is not using the defines,  that's why I'm not finding it.

It gets set as part of P*D_TYPE_TABLE via p*d_populate(). We use the
P*D_TABLE_BIT mostly for checking whether it's a huge page or not (the
arm64 hugetlbpage.c code).

-- 
Catalin