Re: [PATCHv3 02/10] ext4: Fix ext4_fc_stats trace point

[Steven Rostedt]

You already replied, but this was what I was working on.

On Thu, 17 Mar 2022 13:01:49 +0100
Sven Schnelle <svens@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> I'm getting the following oops with that patch:

I think I know the issue.

> 
> [    0.937455] VFS: Disk quotas dquot_6.6.0
> [    0.937474] VFS: Dquot-cache hash table entries: 512 (order 0, 4096 bytes)
> [    0.958347] Unable to handle kernel pointer dereference in virtual kernel address space
> [    0.958350] Failing address: 00000000010de000 TEID: 00000000010de407
> [    0.958353] Fault in home space mode while using kernel ASCE.
> [    0.958357] AS:0000000001ed0007 R3:00000002ffff0007 S:0000000001003701
> [    0.958388] Oops: 0004 ilc:3 [#1] SMP
> [    0.958393] Modules linked in:
> [    0.958398] CPU: 0 PID: 8 Comm: kworker/u128:0 Not tainted 5.17.0-rc8-next-20220317 #396
> [    0.958403] Hardware name: IBM 3906 M04 704 (z/VM 7.1.0)

I'm guessing this is a s390?

> [    0.958407] Workqueue: eval_map_wq eval_map_work_func
> 
> [    0.958446] Krnl PSW : 0704e00180000000 000000000090a9d6 (number+0x25e/0x3c0)
> [    0.958456]            R:0 T:1 IO:1 EX:1 Key:0 M:1 W:0 P:0 AS:3 CC:2 PM:0 RI:0 EA:3
> [    0.958461] Krnl GPRS: 0000000000000058 00000000010de0ac 0000000000000001 00000000fffffffc
> [    0.958467]            0000038000047b80 0affffff010de0ab 0000000000000000 0000000000000000
> [    0.958481]            0000000000000020 0000038000000000 00000000010de0ad 00000000010de0ab
> [    0.958484]            0000000080312100 0000000000e68910 0000038000047b50 0000038000047ab8
> [    0.958494] Krnl Code: 000000000090a9c6: f0c84112b001        srp     274(13,%r4),1(%r11),8
> [    0.958494]            000000000090a9cc: 41202001            la      %r2,1(%r2)
> [    0.958494]           #000000000090a9d0: ecab0006c065        clgrj   %r10,%r11,12,000000000090a9dc
> [    0.958494]           >000000000090a9d6: d200b0004000        mvc     0(1,%r11),0(%r4)
> [    0.958494]            000000000090a9dc: 41b0b001            la      %r11,1(%r11)
> [    0.958494]            000000000090a9e0: a74bffff
>             aghi    %r4,-1
> [    0.958494]            000000000090a9e4: a727fff6            brctg   %r2,000000000090a9d0
> [    0.958494]            000000000090a9e8: a73affff            ahi     %r3,-1
> [    0.958575] Call Trace:
> [    0.958580]  [<000000000090a9d6>] number+0x25e/0x3c0
> [    0.958594] ([<0000000000289516>] update_event_printk+0xde/0x200)
> [    0.958602]  [<0000000000910020>] vsnprintf+0x4b0/0x7c8
> [    0.958606]  [<00000000009103e8>] snprintf+0x40/0x50
> [    0.958610]  [<00000000002893d2>] eval_replace+0x62/0xc8
> [    0.958614]  [<000000000028e2fe>] trace_event_eval_update+0x206/0x248
> [    0.958619]  [<0000000000171bba>] process_one_work+0x1fa/0x460
> [    0.958625]  [<000000000017234c>] worker_thread+0x64/0x468
> [    0.958629]  [<000000000017af90>] kthread+0x108/0x110
> [    0.958634]  [<00000000001032ec>] __ret_from_fork+0x3c/0x58
> [    0.958640]  [<0000000000cce43a>] ret_from_fork+0xa/0x40
> [    0.958648] Last Breaking-Event-Address:
> [    0.958652]  [<000000000090a99c>] number+0x224/0x3c0
> [    0.958661] Kernel panic - not syncing: Fatal exception: panic_on_oops
> 
> I haven't really checked what TRACE_DEFINE_ENUM() does, but removing the
> last line ("TRACE_DEFINE_ENUM(EXT4_FC_REASON_MAX);") makes the oops go
> away. Looking at all the other defines looks like the _MAX enum
> shouldn't be added there?

What I believe is happening is that we are modifying different memory to
fix up the enums by the types. The print_fmt happens to be defined by:

static char print_fmt_##call[] = print;

Which is writable. But the types are defined with:

.type = #_type"["__stringify(_len)"]", .name = #_item,

Which are not. It just so happens that on x86 this is still writable
during boot up, so it wasn't a problem.

[ here I wanted to add a patch, but I haven't figured out the best way to
  fix it yet. ]

-- Steve