Re: [GIT PULL] scheduler updates for v5.18

[Huang, Ying]

Hi, Ingo,

Ingo Molnar <mingo@xxxxxxxxxx> writes:

> * Ingo Molnar <mingo@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
>> 
>> * Linus Torvalds <torvalds@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> 
>> > On Mon, Mar 21, 2022 at 6:13 AM Qian Cai <quic_qiancai@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> > >
>> > > On Mon, Mar 21, 2022 at 11:54:09AM +0100, Ingo Molnar wrote:
>> > > > Huang Ying (3):
>> > > >       sched/numa-balancing: Move some document to make it consistent with the code
>> > > >       sched/numa: Fix NUMA topology for systems with CPU-less nodes
>> > > >       sched/numa: Avoid migrating task to CPU-less node
>> > >
>> > > Linus, I don't think you want to merge this as-is. This will introduce a
>> > > kernel crash on arm64 NUMA as mentioned in this thread,
>> > 
>> > Ok, dropped from my queue. Thanks,
>> 
>> I've reverted the broken commit & will send another pull request after 
>> some testing. Sorry about that!
>
> Ended up using the fix below instead - it's tested already on the affected 
> system.
>

Thanks a lot for your help!

Is it a general rule to send a fixing patch for the bug of a patch
merged by tip tree?  Or a new version of the patch is acceptable too?

Best Regards,
Huang, Ying