Re: [PATCH -next v2 2/4] mm: page_table_check: add hooks to public helpers

From: Tong Tiangen
Date: Wed Mar 23 2022 - 22:08:21 EST




在 2022/3/24 1:42, Pasha Tatashin 写道:
On Tue, Mar 22, 2022 at 10:25 AM Tong Tiangen <tongtiangen@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

Move ptep_clear() to the include/linux/pgtable.h and add page table check
relate hooks to some helpers, it's prepare for support page table check
feature on new architecture.

Signed-off-by: Tong Tiangen <tongtiangen@xxxxxxxxxx>
---
arch/x86/include/asm/pgtable.h | 10 ----------
include/linux/pgtable.h | 27 +++++++++++++++++++--------
2 files changed, 19 insertions(+), 18 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/pgtable.h b/arch/x86/include/asm/pgtable.h
index 8cd6514e3052..8c85f2eabbaa 100644
--- a/arch/x86/include/asm/pgtable.h
+++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/pgtable.h
@@ -1077,16 +1077,6 @@ static inline pte_t ptep_get_and_clear_full(struct mm_struct *mm,
return pte;
}

-#define __HAVE_ARCH_PTEP_CLEAR
-static inline void ptep_clear(struct mm_struct *mm, unsigned long addr,
- pte_t *ptep)
-{
- if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_PAGE_TABLE_CHECK))
- ptep_get_and_clear(mm, addr, ptep);
- else
- pte_clear(mm, addr, ptep);
-}
-
#define __HAVE_ARCH_PTEP_SET_WRPROTECT
static inline void ptep_set_wrprotect(struct mm_struct *mm,
unsigned long addr, pte_t *ptep)
diff --git a/include/linux/pgtable.h b/include/linux/pgtable.h
index f4f4077b97aa..d27fd0ed84a9 100644
--- a/include/linux/pgtable.h
+++ b/include/linux/pgtable.h
@@ -12,6 +12,7 @@
#include <linux/bug.h>
#include <linux/errno.h>
#include <asm-generic/pgtable_uffd.h>
+#include <linux/page_table_check.h>

#if 5 - defined(__PAGETABLE_P4D_FOLDED) - defined(__PAGETABLE_PUD_FOLDED) - \
defined(__PAGETABLE_PMD_FOLDED) != CONFIG_PGTABLE_LEVELS
@@ -259,14 +260,6 @@ static inline int pmdp_clear_flush_young(struct vm_area_struct *vma,
#endif /* CONFIG_TRANSPARENT_HUGEPAGE */
#endif

-#ifndef __HAVE_ARCH_PTEP_CLEAR
-static inline void ptep_clear(struct mm_struct *mm, unsigned long addr,
- pte_t *ptep)
-{
- pte_clear(mm, addr, ptep);
-}
-#endif
-
#ifndef __HAVE_ARCH_PTEP_GET_AND_CLEAR
static inline pte_t ptep_get_and_clear(struct mm_struct *mm,
unsigned long address,
@@ -274,10 +267,23 @@ static inline pte_t ptep_get_and_clear(struct mm_struct *mm,
{
pte_t pte = *ptep;
pte_clear(mm, address, ptep);
+ page_table_check_pte_clear(mm, address, pte);
return pte;
}
#endif

+#ifndef __HAVE_ARCH_PTEP_CLEAR
+static inline void ptep_clear(struct mm_struct *mm, unsigned long addr,
+ pte_t *ptep)
+{
+#ifdef CONFIG_PAGE_TABLE_CHECK
+ ptep_get_and_clear(mm, addr, ptep);
+#else
+ pte_clear(mm, addr, ptep);
+#endif

I have a preference to use if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_PAGE_TABLE_CHECK))
instead of #ifdef. The end result is the same. Otherwise it looks
good.

Thanks,
Pasha
.

I have a little hesitation when making this change , in theory, add if here may affect the performance a little in some scenarios. However, the impact on the whole call path should be small.

I will send v3 using if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_PAGE_TABLE_CHECK)).

Thanks.
Tong
.