Re: [PATCH] tracing: do not export user_events uapi
From: Masahiro Yamada
Date: Thu Mar 31 2022 - 03:30:44 EST
On Thu, Mar 31, 2022 at 5:21 AM Steven Rostedt <rostedt@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
>
> Adding the build maintainers.
>
> -- Steve
>
> On Wed, 30 Mar 2022 16:17:55 -0400
> Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> > In addition to mark the USER_EVENTS feature BROKEN until all interested
> > parties figure out the user-space API, do not install the uapi header.
> >
> > This prevents situations where a non-final uapi header would end up
> > being installed into a distribution image and used to build user-space
> > programs that would then run against newer kernels that will implement
> > user events with a different ABI.
> >
> > Link: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20220330155835.5e1f6669@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > ---
> > include/uapi/Kbuild | 3 +++
> > 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+)
> >
> > diff --git a/include/uapi/Kbuild b/include/uapi/Kbuild
> > index 61ee6e59c930..425ea8769ddc 100644
> > --- a/include/uapi/Kbuild
> > +++ b/include/uapi/Kbuild
> > @@ -12,3 +12,6 @@ ifeq ($(wildcard $(objtree)/arch/$(SRCARCH)/include/generated/uapi/asm/kvm_para.
> > no-export-headers += linux/kvm_para.h
> > endif
> > endif
> > +
> > +# API is not finalized
> > +no-export-headers += linux/user_events.h
>
Well, the intended usage of no-export-headers is to
cater to the UAPI supported by only some architectures.
We have kvm(_para).h here because not all architectures
support kvm.
If you do not want to export the UAPI,
you should not put it in include/uapi/.
After the API is finalized, you can move it to
include/uapi.
--
Best Regards
Masahiro Yamada