Re: [PATCH] habanalabs: Elide a warning on 32-bit targets

[Palmer Dabbelt]

On Mon, 04 Apr 2022 08:02:41 PDT (-0700), Greg KH wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 01, 2022 at 11:36:53AM -0700, Palmer Dabbelt wrote:
> > On Fri, 01 Apr 2022 11:13:48 PDT (-0700), ogabbay@xxxxxxxxxx wrote:
> > > On Fri, Apr 1, 2022 at 7:41 PM Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > From: Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > > >
> > > > This double-cast pattern looks a bit awkward, but it already exists
> > > > elsewhere in the driver.  Without this patch I get
> > > >
> > > > drivers/misc/habanalabs/common/memory.c: In function ‘alloc_device_memory’:
> > > > drivers/misc/habanalabs/common/memory.c:153:49: warning: cast from pointer to integer of different size [-Wpointer-to-int-cast]
> > > >   153 |                                                 (u64) gen_pool_dma_alloc_align(vm->dram_pg_pool,
> > > >       |                                                 ^
> > > >
> > > > which ends up promoted to a build error in my test setup.
> > > >
> > > > Signed-off-by: Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > > >
> > > > ---
> > > >
> > > > I don't know anything about this driver, I'm just pattern-matching the
> > > > warning away.
> > > > ---
> > > >  drivers/misc/habanalabs/common/memory.c | 10 +++++-----
> > > >  1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
> > > >
> > > > diff --git a/drivers/misc/habanalabs/common/memory.c b/drivers/misc/habanalabs/common/memory.c
> > > > index e008d82e4ba3..f1fc79c1fc10 100644
> > > > --- a/drivers/misc/habanalabs/common/memory.c
> > > > +++ b/drivers/misc/habanalabs/common/memory.c
> > > > @@ -150,12 +150,12 @@ static int alloc_device_memory(struct hl_ctx *ctx, struct hl_mem_in *args,
> > > >                 for (i = 0 ; i < num_pgs ; i++) {
> > > >                         if (is_power_of_2(page_size))
> > > >                                 phys_pg_pack->pages[i] =
> > > > -                                               (u64) gen_pool_dma_alloc_align(vm->dram_pg_pool,
> > > > -                                                                               page_size, NULL,
> > > > -                                                                               page_size);
> > > > +                                               (u64) (uintptr_t) gen_pool_dma_alloc_align(vm->dram_pg_pool,
> > > > +                                                                                          page_size, NULL,
> > > > +                                                                                          page_size);
> > > >                         else
> > > > -                               phys_pg_pack->pages[i] = (u64) gen_pool_alloc(vm->dram_pg_pool,
> > > > -                                                                               page_size);
> > > > +                               phys_pg_pack->pages[i] = (u64) (uintptr_t) gen_pool_alloc(vm->dram_pg_pool,
> > > > +                                                                                         page_size);
> > > >                         if (!phys_pg_pack->pages[i]) {
> > > >                                 dev_err(hdev->dev,
> > > >                                         "Failed to allocate device memory (out of memory)\n");
> > > > --
> > > > 2.34.1
> > > >
> > >
> > > This patch is:
> > > Reviewed-by: Oded Gabbay <ogabbay@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > >
> > > Greg,
> > > Could you please apply this directly to your misc tree and send it to
> > > Linus at your next pull request ?
> > > I don't have any other fixes pending for 5.18.
> > >
> > > For 5.19 we will do a more elegant solution that Arnd has recommended.
> >
> > Thanks.
> >
> > Assuming this is too late for rc1, would it be possibe to have it in
> > something I can take into my fixes/for-next without too much diff?  I put
> > this on top of the offending commit with a
> >
> > Fixes: e8458e20e0a3 ("habanalabs: make sure device mem alloc is page aligned")
> >
> > at kernel.org/palmer/habana , if that helps any.  No big deal if it goes in
> > another way, it's just nice to keep allyesconfig building on my branches
> > directly.
>
> Looks like Guenter sent in a "more complete" version of this.  I'll
> queue it up to my tree and get it to Linus for -rc2.

I'm fine with anything here, as long as it fixes my build errors ;).

Do you mind giving me a pointer?  That way I can use exactly what's 
going upstream, rather that keeping around this now-dead-end diff (I 
poked around your kernel.org trees and couldn't find anything, but I've 
not done that before).