RE: [PATCH] extcon: ptn5150: add usb role class support

From: Jun Li
Date: Wed Apr 06 2022 - 11:10:02 EST




> -----Original Message-----
> From: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Sent: Wednesday, April 6, 2022 6:16 PM
> To: Jun Li <jun.li@xxxxxxx>; myungjoo.ham@xxxxxxxxxxx;
> cw00.choi@xxxxxxxxxxx
> Cc: linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; Frank Li <frank.li@xxxxxxx>; Xu Yang
> <xu.yang_2@xxxxxxx>
> Subject: Re: [PATCH] extcon: ptn5150: add usb role class support
>
> On 06/04/2022 11:42, Li Jun wrote:
> > Add support of usb role class consumer to do role switch.
>
> Please mention also why you are doing this.

Will improve in v2.

>
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Li Jun <jun.li@xxxxxxx>
> > ---
> > drivers/extcon/Kconfig | 1 +
> > drivers/extcon/extcon-ptn5150.c | 39 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> > 2 files changed, 40 insertions(+)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/extcon/Kconfig b/drivers/extcon/Kconfig
> > index 0d42e49105dd..9828ade787a8 100644
> > --- a/drivers/extcon/Kconfig
> > +++ b/drivers/extcon/Kconfig
> > @@ -132,6 +132,7 @@ config EXTCON_PTN5150
> > tristate "NXP PTN5150 CC LOGIC USB EXTCON support"
> > depends on I2C && (GPIOLIB || COMPILE_TEST)
> > select REGMAP_I2C
> > + select USB_ROLE_SWITCH
>
> You do not need to select it. Driver will work without role switch,
> won't it? If it works, then probably it should be just imply.

Okay, usb role class provider should enable this for me, will drop it.

>
> > help
> > Say Y here to enable support for USB peripheral and USB host
> > detection by NXP PTN5150 CC (Configuration Channel) logic chip.
> > diff --git a/drivers/extcon/extcon-ptn5150.c
> b/drivers/extcon/extcon-ptn5150.c
> > index 5b9a3cf8df26..821b0f390308 100644
> > --- a/drivers/extcon/extcon-ptn5150.c
> > +++ b/drivers/extcon/extcon-ptn5150.c
> > @@ -17,6 +17,7 @@
> > #include <linux/slab.h>
> > #include <linux/extcon-provider.h>
> > #include <linux/gpio/consumer.h>
> > +#include <linux/usb/role.h>
> >
> > /* PTN5150 registers */
> > #define PTN5150_REG_DEVICE_ID 0x01
> > @@ -52,6 +53,7 @@ struct ptn5150_info {
> > int irq;
> > struct work_struct irq_work;
> > struct mutex mutex;
> > + struct usb_role_switch *role_sw;
> > };
> >
> > /* List of detectable cables */
> > @@ -85,6 +87,12 @@ static void ptn5150_check_state(struct ptn5150_info
> *info)
> > extcon_set_state_sync(info->edev, EXTCON_USB_HOST, false);
> > gpiod_set_value_cansleep(info->vbus_gpiod, 0);
> > extcon_set_state_sync(info->edev, EXTCON_USB, true);
> > +
> > + ret = usb_role_switch_set_role(info->role_sw, USB_ROLE_DEVICE);
> > + if (ret)
> > + dev_err(info->dev, "failed to set device role: %d\n",
> > + ret);
> > +
> > break;
> > case PTN5150_UFP_ATTACHED:
> > extcon_set_state_sync(info->edev, EXTCON_USB, false);
> > @@ -95,6 +103,12 @@ static void ptn5150_check_state(struct ptn5150_info
> *info)
> > gpiod_set_value_cansleep(info->vbus_gpiod, 1);
> >
> > extcon_set_state_sync(info->edev, EXTCON_USB_HOST, true);
> > +
> > + ret = usb_role_switch_set_role(info->role_sw, USB_ROLE_HOST);
> > + if (ret)
> > + dev_err(info->dev, "failed to set host role: %d\n",
> > + ret);
> > +
>
>
> Instead of having usb_role_switch_set_role() in two places, how about:
> 1. setting local variable to USB_ROLE_HOST/USB_ROLE_NONE
> 2. return on default
> 3. one call to usb_role_switch_set_role() outside of the case?
>
> Should create less code.

Yes, this will be better, I will update in v2.

>
> > break;
> > default:
> > break;
> > @@ -133,6 +147,13 @@ static void ptn5150_irq_work(struct work_struct
> *work)
> > extcon_set_state_sync(info->edev,
> > EXTCON_USB, false);
> > gpiod_set_value_cansleep(info->vbus_gpiod, 0);
> > +
> > + ret = usb_role_switch_set_role(info->role_sw,
> > + USB_ROLE_NONE);
> > + if (ret)
> > + dev_err(info->dev,
> > + "failed to set none role: %d\n",
> > + ret);
> > }
> > }
> >
> > @@ -194,6 +215,14 @@ static int ptn5150_init_dev_type(struct ptn5150_info
> *info)
> > return 0;
> > }
> >
> > +static void ptn5150_put_role_sw(void *data)
> > +{
> > + struct ptn5150_info *info = data;
> > +
> > + cancel_work_sync(&info->irq_work);
>
> This looks independent and should be executed always - even if getting
> role_sw in probe does not succeed.

Agreed, I will add one patch to make this action taken in all cases.

Thanks
Li Jun

>
> > + usb_role_switch_put(info->role_sw);
> > +}
> > +
>
>
>
> Best regards,
> Krzysztof