Re: [PATCH v4 1/2] ray_cs: Improve card_status[]

[Joe Perches]

On Wed, 2022-04-06 at 17:22 +0200, Benjamin Stürz wrote:
> Replace comments with C99's designated initializers to improve
> readability and maintainability.
[]
> diff --git a/drivers/net/wireless/ray_cs.c b/drivers/net/wireless/ray_cs.c
[]
> @@ -2529,20 +2529,23 @@ static void clear_interrupt(ray_dev_t *local)
>  #define MAXDATA (PAGE_SIZE - 80)
>  
>  static const char *card_status[] = {
> -	"Card inserted - uninitialized",	/* 0 */
> -	"Card not downloaded",			/* 1 */
> -	"Waiting for download parameters",	/* 2 */
> -	"Card doing acquisition",		/* 3 */
> -	"Acquisition complete",			/* 4 */
> -	"Authentication complete",		/* 5 */
> -	"Association complete",			/* 6 */
> -	"???", "???", "???", "???",		/* 7 8 9 10 undefined */
> -	"Card init error",			/* 11 */
> -	"Download parameters error",		/* 12 */
> -	"???",					/* 13 */
> -	"Acquisition failed",			/* 14 */
> -	"Authentication refused",		/* 15 */
> -	"Association failed"			/* 16 */
> +	[CARD_INSERTED]		= "Card inserted - uninitialized",
> +	[CARD_AWAITING_PARAM]	= "Card not downloaded",
> +	[CARD_DL_PARAM]		= "Waiting for download parameters",
> +	[CARD_DOING_ACQ]	= "Card doing acquisition",
> +	[CARD_ACQ_COMPLETE]	= "Acquisition complete",
> +	[CARD_AUTH_COMPLETE]	= "Authentication complete",
> +	[CARD_ASSOC_COMPLETE]	= "Association complete",
> +	[7]			= "???",
> +	[8]			= "???",
> +	[9]			= "???",
> +	[10]			= "???",

Rather than using specific numbers and "???"
it's probably better to use no initialization at all
and change the output call to test the array index
ao all of the [number] = "???" could be removed.

---
 drivers/net/wireless/ray_cs.c | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/drivers/net/wireless/ray_cs.c b/drivers/net/wireless/ray_cs.c
index 87e98ab068ed..29451cd0a22a 100644
--- a/drivers/net/wireless/ray_cs.c
+++ b/drivers/net/wireless/ray_cs.c
@@ -2600,7 +2600,7 @@ static int ray_cs_proc_show(struct seq_file *m, void *v)
 		i = 10;
 	if (i > 16)
 		i = 10;
-	seq_printf(m, "Card status          = %s\n", card_status[i]);
+	seq_printf(m, "Card status          = %s\n", card_status[i] ?: "???");
 
 	seq_printf(m, "Framing mode         = %s\n", framing[translate]);