Re: [PATCH v5 00/13] KVM: mm: fd-based approach for supporting KVM guest private memory

From: Andy Lutomirski
Date: Wed Apr 06 2022 - 16:23:06 EST




On Tue, Apr 5, 2022, at 11:30 AM, Sean Christopherson wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 05, 2022, Andy Lutomirski wrote:

>
>> resume guest
>> *** host -> hypervisor -> guest ***
>> Guest unshares the page.
>> *** guest -> hypervisor ***
>> Hypervisor removes PTE. TLBI.
>> *** hypervisor -> guest ***
>>
>> Obviously considerable cleverness is needed to make a virt IOMMU like this
>> work well, but still.
>>
>> Anyway, my suggestion is that the fd backing proposal get slightly modified
>> to get it ready for multiple subtypes of backing object, which should be a
>> pretty minimal change. Then, if someone actually needs any of this
>> cleverness, it can be added later. In the mean time, the
>> pread()/pwrite()/splice() scheme is pretty good.
>
> Tangentially related to getting private-fd ready for multiple things,
> what about
> implementing the pread()/pwrite()/splice() scheme in pKVM itself? I.e.
> read() on
> the VM fd, with the offset corresponding to gfn in some way.
>

Hmm, could make sense.