Re: [PATCH] platform/chrome: cros_ec_typec: Check for EC driver

[Akihiko Odaki]

On 2022/04/08 1:28, Guenter Roeck wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 6, 2022 at 6:16 PM Akihiko Odaki <akihiko.odaki@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> [ ... ]
> > > > >         ec_dev = dev_get_drvdata(&typec->ec->ec->dev);
>
> I completely missed the part that this is not on the parent.
>
> > > > > +     if (!ec_dev)
> > > > > +             return -EPROBE_DEFER;
> [ ... ]
> > 1. The parent exists and dev_get_drvdata(pdev->dev.parent) returns
> > non-NULL value. However, dev_get_drvdata(&typec->ec->ec->dev) returns
> > NULL. (Yes, that is confusing.) I'm wondering
>
> I am actually surprised that typec->ec->ec is not NULL. Underlying
> problem (or, one underlying problem) is that it is set in
> cros_ec_register():
>
>          /* Register a platform device for the main EC instance */
>          ec_dev->ec = platform_device_register_data(ec_dev->dev, "cros-ec-dev",
>                                          PLATFORM_DEVID_AUTO, &ec_p,
>                                          sizeof(struct cros_ec_platform));
>
> "cros-ec-dev" is the mfd device which instantiates the character
> device. On devicetree (arm64) systems, the typec device is registered
> as child of google,cros-ec-spi and thus should be instantiated only
> after the spi device has been instantiated. The same should happen on
> ACPI systems, but I don't know if that is really correct.
>
> I don't know what exactly is happening, but apparently typec
> registration happens in parallel with cros-ec-dev registration, which
> is delayed because the character device is not loaded. As mentioned, I
> don't understand why typec->ec->ec is not NULL. Can you check what it
> points to ?

If I read the code correctly, the registration itself happens 
synchronously and platform_device_register_data() always returns a 
non-NULL value unless it returns -ENOMEM. The driver, however, can be 
asynchronously bound and dev_get_drvdata(&typec->ec->ec->dev) can return 
NULL as the consequence. It would have a call trace like the following 
when scheduling asynchronous driver binding:
platform_device_register_data()
platform_device_register_resndata()
platform_device_register_full()
-  This always creates and returns platform_device.
platform_device_add()
- This adds the created platform_device.
device_add()
bus_probe_device()
device_initial_probe()
__device_attach()
- This schedules asynchronous probing.

typec->ec->ec should be pointing to the correct platform_device as the 
patched driver works without Oops on my computer. It is not NULL at least.

Regards,
Akihiko Odaki

> Thanks,
> Guenter
>
> > dev_get_drvdata(pdev->dev.parent) returned NULL in the following crash
> > log but it would be a problem distinct from what is handled with my patch:
> > https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/CABXOdTe9u_DW=NZM1-J120Gu1gibDy8SsgHP3bJwwLsE_iuLAQ@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx/
> >
> > 2. My patch returns -EPROBE_DEFER instead of -ENODEV and I confirmed it
> > will eventually be instantiated.
> >
> > Regards,
> > Akihiko Odaki
> >
> > > Guenter
> > >
> > > > Thanks,
> > > >
> > > > [1] https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/commit/drivers/platform/chrome?id=ffebd90532728086007038986900426544e3df4e