Re: [PATCH] drm/amd/display: Fix indenting mistakes in dcn10_hw_sequencer.c

From: Alex Deucher
Date: Thu Apr 07 2022 - 13:37:40 EST


On Thu, Apr 7, 2022 at 1:32 PM Harry Wentland <harry.wentland@xxxxxxx> wrote:
>
>
>
> On 2022-04-07 12:07, Alex Deucher wrote:
> > Actually this just causes another warning. Dropped for now. More below.
> >
> > On Thu, Apr 7, 2022 at 11:52 AM Alex Deucher <alexdeucher@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >>
> >> Applied. Thanks!
> >>
> >> Alex
> >>
> >> On Thu, Apr 7, 2022 at 10:18 AM Harry Wentland <harry.wentland@xxxxxxx> wrote:
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> On 2022-04-07 02:00, Haowen Bai wrote:
> >>>> Smatch reports the following:
> >>>> drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/../display/dc/dcn10/dcn10_hw_sequencer.c:2174
> >>>> dcn10_enable_vblanks_synchronization() warn: if statement not indented
> >>>>
> >>>> Signed-off-by: Haowen Bai <baihaowen@xxxxxxxxx>
> >>>
> >>> Reviewed-by: Harry Wentland <harry.wentland@xxxxxxx>
> >>>
> >>> Harry
> >>>
> >>>> ---
> >>>> drivers/gpu/drm/amd/display/dc/dcn10/dcn10_hw_sequencer.c | 14 +++++++-------
> >>>> 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
> >>>>
> >>>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/display/dc/dcn10/dcn10_hw_sequencer.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/display/dc/dcn10/dcn10_hw_sequencer.c
> >>>> index ee22f4422d26..3c338b85040c 100644
> >>>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/display/dc/dcn10/dcn10_hw_sequencer.c
> >>>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/display/dc/dcn10/dcn10_hw_sequencer.c
> >>>> @@ -2172,13 +2172,13 @@ void dcn10_enable_vblanks_synchronization(
> >>>> if (master >= 0) {
> >>>> for (i = 0; i < group_size; i++) {
> >>>> if (i != master && !grouped_pipes[i]->stream->has_non_synchronizable_pclk)
> >>>> - grouped_pipes[i]->stream_res.tg->funcs->align_vblanks(
> >>>> - grouped_pipes[master]->stream_res.tg,
> >>>> - grouped_pipes[i]->stream_res.tg,
> >>>> - grouped_pipes[master]->stream->timing.pix_clk_100hz,
> >>>> - grouped_pipes[i]->stream->timing.pix_clk_100hz,
> >>>> - get_clock_divider(grouped_pipes[master], false),
> >>>> - get_clock_divider(grouped_pipes[i], false));
> >>>> + grouped_pipes[i]->stream_res.tg->funcs->align_vblanks(
> >>>> + grouped_pipes[master]->stream_res.tg,
> >>>> + grouped_pipes[i]->stream_res.tg,
> >>>> + grouped_pipes[master]->stream->timing.pix_clk_100hz,
> >>>> + grouped_pipes[i]->stream->timing.pix_clk_100hz,
> >>>> + get_clock_divider(grouped_pipes[master], false),
> >>>> + get_clock_divider(grouped_pipes[i], false));
> >>>> grouped_pipes[i]->stream->vblank_synchronized = true;
> >
> > @Harry Wentland should this last statement be part of the if clause or
> > the for loop?
> >
>
> It should be part of the if clause.

Can one of you send a patch to fix that up?

Thanks!

Alex

>
> Harry
>
> > Alex
> >
> >>>> }
> >>>> grouped_pipes[master]->stream->vblank_synchronized = true;
> >>>
>