Re: [PATCH 07/18] MIPS: DTS: jz4780: fix otg node as reported by dtbscheck

From: Paul Cercueil
Date: Sat Apr 09 2022 - 08:27:21 EST


Hi,

Le sam., avril 9 2022 at 13:15:37 +0200, Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@xxxxxxxxxx> a écrit :
On 08/04/2022 20:37, H. Nikolaus Schaller wrote:
arch/mips/boot/dts/ingenic/ci20.dtb: usb@13500000: compatible: 'oneOf' conditional failed, one must be fixed:
['ingenic,jz4780-otg', 'snps,dwc2'] is too long
['ingenic,jz4780-otg', 'snps,dwc2'] is too short
'brcm,bcm2835-usb' was expected
'hisilicon,hi6220-usb' was expected
'rockchip,rk3066-usb' was expected
'ingenic,jz4780-otg' is not one of ['rockchip,px30-usb', 'rockchip,rk3036-usb', 'rockchip,rk3188-usb', 'rockchip,rk3228-usb', 'rockchip,rk3288-usb', 'rockchip,rk3308-usb', 'rockchip,rk3328-usb', 'rockchip,rk3368-usb', 'rockchip,rv1108-usb']
'lantiq,arx100-usb' was expected
'lantiq,xrx200-usb' was expected
'ingenic,jz4780-otg' is not one of ['amlogic,meson8-usb', 'amlogic,meson8b-usb', 'amlogic,meson-gxbb-usb', 'amlogic,meson-g12a-usb', 'intel,socfpga-agilex-hsotg']
'amcc,dwc-otg' was expected
'apm,apm82181-dwc-otg' was expected
'snps,dwc2' was expected
'st,stm32f4x9-fsotg' was expected
'st,stm32f4x9-hsotg' was expected
'st,stm32f7-hsotg' was expected
'st,stm32mp15-fsotg' was expected
'st,stm32mp15-hsotg' was expected
'samsung,s3c6400-hsotg' was expected
'intel,socfpga-agilex-hsotg' was expected

You really don't need to paste entire warning.


From schema: Documentation/devicetree/bindings/usb/dwc2.yaml

Signed-off-by: H. Nikolaus Schaller <hns@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
arch/mips/boot/dts/ingenic/jz4780.dtsi | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/arch/mips/boot/dts/ingenic/jz4780.dtsi b/arch/mips/boot/dts/ingenic/jz4780.dtsi
index 2021836983c96..c5124459678b7 100644
--- a/arch/mips/boot/dts/ingenic/jz4780.dtsi
+++ b/arch/mips/boot/dts/ingenic/jz4780.dtsi
@@ -576,7 +576,7 @@ bch: bch@134d0000 {
};

otg: usb@13500000 {
- compatible = "ingenic,jz4780-otg", "snps,dwc2";
+ compatible = "snps,dwc2";

This looks wrong, the block usually should have a specific compatible.
Please mention why it does not.

Agreed. The "snps,dwc2" should be a fallback string, otherwise there is no way to uniquely identify the JZ4780 implementation of the IP.

Cheers,
-Paul