Re: [PATCH] perf tools: Fix perf's libperf_print callback

[Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo]

Em Fri, Apr 08, 2022 at 04:26:25PM +0300, Adrian Hunter escreveu:
> eprintf does not expect va_list as the 4th parameter.
> Use veprintf because it does.

You forgot to add this:

Fixes: 428dab813a56ce94 ("libperf: Merge libperf_set_print() into libperf_init()")

Please consider doing it next time.

Thanks, applied.

- Arnaldo
 
> Signed-off-by: Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@xxxxxxxxx>
> ---
>  tools/perf/perf.c | 2 +-
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/tools/perf/perf.c b/tools/perf/perf.c
> index 2f6b67189b42..6aae7b6c376b 100644
> --- a/tools/perf/perf.c
> +++ b/tools/perf/perf.c
> @@ -434,7 +434,7 @@ void pthread__unblock_sigwinch(void)
>  static int libperf_print(enum libperf_print_level level,
>  			 const char *fmt, va_list ap)
>  {
> -	return eprintf(level, verbose, fmt, ap);
> +	return veprintf(level, verbose, fmt, ap);
>  }
>  
>  int main(int argc, const char **argv)
> -- 
> 2.25.1

-- 

- Arnaldo