Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] leds: pca955x: Clean up and optimize

From: Eddie James
Date: Mon Apr 11 2022 - 11:18:23 EST



On 4/8/22 06:11, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
On Thu, Apr 7, 2022 at 10:42 PM Eddie James <eajames@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Clean up the I2C access functions to avoid fetching the pca955x
driver data again. Optimize the probe to do at most 4 reads and
4 writes of the LED selector regs, rather than 16 of each.
Rename some functions and variables to be more consistent and
descriptive.
Separate patch.


Ack.




+ dev_err(&pca955x->client->dev,
+ "%s: reg 0x%x, val 0x%x, err %d\n", __func__, n, val,
+ ret);
This can be indented better.

I would add a temporary dev pointer variable and put this on one line.

struct device *dev = &pca955x->client->dev;

dev_err(dev, "%s: reg 0x%x, val 0x%x, err %d\n",
__func__, n, val, ret);


Hm, I still end up having to use two lines for the dev_err function, so not sure it's worth it?



...

+ dev_err(&pca955x->client->dev,
+ "%s: reg 0x%x, val 0x%x, err %d\n", __func__, n, val,
+ ret);
Ditto.

...

+ dev_err(&pca955x->client->dev,
+ "%s: reg 0x%x, val 0x%x, err %d\n", __func__, n, val,
+ ret);
Ditto.

...

+ dev_err(&pca955x->client->dev, "%s: reg 0x%x, err %d\n",
__func__, n, ret);
Ditto.

...

+ dev_err(&pca955x->client->dev, "%s: reg 0x%x, err %d\n",
__func__, n, ret);
Ditto.

...

+ struct pca955x_led *pca955x_led = container_of(led_cdev,
+ struct pca955x_led,
+ led_cdev);
Is it used once? If more than once, consider a helper for that as well.


Ack.


Thanks for the review!

Eddie