Re: [PATCH 4.9 00/43] 4.9.310-rc1 review

From: Greg Kroah-Hartman
Date: Tue Apr 12 2022 - 01:51:24 EST


On Thu, Apr 07, 2022 at 06:20:28PM +0100, James Morse wrote:
> Hi Greg,
>
> On 07/04/2022 11:23, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> > On Thu, Apr 07, 2022 at 02:32:38AM -0700, Guenter Roeck wrote:
> >> On Wed, Apr 06, 2022 at 08:26:09PM +0200, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> >>> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 4.9.310 release.
> >>> There are 43 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> >>> to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> >>> let me know.
> >>>
> >>> Responses should be made by Fri, 08 Apr 2022 18:24:27 +0000.
> >>> Anything received after that time might be too late.
> >>>
> >>
> >> Build results:
> >> total: 163 pass: 161 fail: 2
> >> Failed builds:
> >> arm64:allnoconfig
> >> arm64:tinyconfig
> >> Qemu test results:
> >> total: 397 pass: 397 fail: 0
> >>
> >> arch/arm64/kernel/cpu_errata.c: In function 'is_spectrev2_safe':
> >> arch/arm64/kernel/cpu_errata.c:829:39: error: 'arm64_bp_harden_smccc_cpus' undeclared
> >>
> >> arch/arm64/kernel/cpu_errata.c: In function 'spectre_bhb_enable_mitigation':
> >> arch/arm64/kernel/cpu_errata.c:839:39: error: '__hardenbp_enab' undeclared
> >>
> >> arch/arm64/kernel/cpu_errata.c:879:42: error: 'bp_hardening_data' undeclared
> >
> > Ick, odds are James did not build with those two configs :(
>
> I'm sure I tried allnoconfig - but evidently messed something up.
>
>
> > James, any chance you can look into this and see what needs to be added
> > or changed with your patch series?
>
> Will do,...

Thanks for the fixup patch, this passes my local build tests so I think
I'll push out the release now.

greg k-h