[PATCH 5.16 209/285] perf: arm-spe: Fix perf report --mem-mode
From: Greg Kroah-Hartman
Date: Tue Apr 12 2022 - 04:08:05 EST
From: James Clark <james.clark@xxxxxxx>
[ Upstream commit ffab487052054162b3b6c9c6005777ec6cfcea05 ]
Since commit bb30acae4c4dacfa ("perf report: Bail out --mem-mode if mem
info is not available") "perf mem report" and "perf report --mem-mode"
don't allow opening the file unless one of the events has
PERF_SAMPLE_DATA_SRC set.
SPE doesn't have this set even though synthetic memory data is generated
after it is decoded. Fix this issue by setting DATA_SRC on SPE events.
This has no effect on the data collected because the SPE driver doesn't
do anything with that flag and doesn't generate samples.
Fixes: bb30acae4c4dacfa ("perf report: Bail out --mem-mode if mem info is not available")
Signed-off-by: James Clark <james.clark@xxxxxxx>
Tested-by: Leo Yan <leo.yan@xxxxxxxxxx>
Acked-by: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@xxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: German Gomez <german.gomez@xxxxxxx>
Cc: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@xxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: John Garry <john.garry@xxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Leo Yan <leo.yan@xxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: linux-arm-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Cc: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@xxxxxxx>
Cc: Mathieu Poirier <mathieu.poirier@xxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Ravi Bangoria <ravi.bangoria@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Will Deacon <will@xxxxxxxxxx>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220408144056.1955535-1-james.clark@xxxxxxx
Signed-off-by: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@xxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@xxxxxxxxxx>
---
tools/perf/arch/arm64/util/arm-spe.c | 6 ++++++
1 file changed, 6 insertions(+)
diff --git a/tools/perf/arch/arm64/util/arm-spe.c b/tools/perf/arch/arm64/util/arm-spe.c
index 2100d46ccf5e..bb4ab99afa7f 100644
--- a/tools/perf/arch/arm64/util/arm-spe.c
+++ b/tools/perf/arch/arm64/util/arm-spe.c
@@ -239,6 +239,12 @@ static int arm_spe_recording_options(struct auxtrace_record *itr,
arm_spe_set_timestamp(itr, arm_spe_evsel);
}
+ /*
+ * Set this only so that perf report knows that SPE generates memory info. It has no effect
+ * on the opening of the event or the SPE data produced.
+ */
+ evsel__set_sample_bit(arm_spe_evsel, DATA_SRC);
+
/* Add dummy event to keep tracking */
err = parse_events(evlist, "dummy:u", NULL);
if (err)
--
2.35.1