Re: [PATCH v3 4/4] hugetlb: Clean up hugetlb_cma_reserve

[Baolin Wang]

On 4/13/2022 11:29 AM, Peng Liu wrote:
> Use more generic functions to deal with issues related to online
> nodes. The changes will make the code simplified.
>
> Signed-off-by: Peng Liu <liupeng256@xxxxxxxxxx>

Looks more consistent. Thanks.
Reviewed-by: Baolin Wang <baolin.wang@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>

> ---
>   mm/hugetlb.c | 4 ++--
>   1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/mm/hugetlb.c b/mm/hugetlb.c
> index 2e4d8d9fb7c6..4c529774cc08 100644
> --- a/mm/hugetlb.c
> +++ b/mm/hugetlb.c
> @@ -6953,7 +6953,7 @@ void __init hugetlb_cma_reserve(int order)
>   		if (hugetlb_cma_size_in_node[nid] == 0)
>   			continue;
>   
> -		if (!node_state(nid, N_ONLINE)) {
> +		if (!node_online(nid)) {
>   			pr_warn("hugetlb_cma: invalid node %d specified\n", nid);
>   			hugetlb_cma_size -= hugetlb_cma_size_in_node[nid];
>   			hugetlb_cma_size_in_node[nid] = 0;
> @@ -6992,7 +6992,7 @@ void __init hugetlb_cma_reserve(int order)
>   	}
>   
>   	reserved = 0;
> -	for_each_node_state(nid, N_ONLINE) {
> +	for_each_online_node(nid) {
>   		int res;
>   		char name[CMA_MAX_NAME];
>