Re: [PATCH v3 11/16] mm/page-flags: reuse PG_mappedtodisk as PG_anon_exclusive for PageAnon() pages
From: Vlastimil Babka
Date: Wed Apr 13 2022 - 04:25:34 EST
On 3/29/22 18:04, David Hildenbrand wrote:
> The basic question we would like to have a reliable and efficient answer
> to is: is this anonymous page exclusive to a single process or might it
> be shared? We need that information for ordinary/single pages, hugetlb
> pages, and possibly each subpage of a THP.
>
> Introduce a way to mark an anonymous page as exclusive, with the
> ultimate goal of teaching our COW logic to not do "wrong COWs", whereby
> GUP pins lose consistency with the pages mapped into the page table,
> resulting in reported memory corruptions.
>
> Most pageflags already have semantics for anonymous pages, however,
> PG_mappedtodisk should never apply to pages in the swapcache, so let's
> reuse that flag.
>
> As PG_has_hwpoisoned also uses that flag on the second tail page of a
> compound page, convert it to PG_error instead, which is marked as
> PF_NO_TAIL, so never used for tail pages.
>
> Use custom page flag modification functions such that we can do
> additional sanity checks. The semantics we'll put into some kernel doc
> in the future are:
>
> "
> PG_anon_exclusive is *usually* only expressive in combination with a
> page table entry. Depending on the page table entry type it might
> store the following information:
>
> Is what's mapped via this page table entry exclusive to the
> single process and can be mapped writable without further
> checks? If not, it might be shared and we might have to COW.
>
> For now, we only expect PTE-mapped THPs to make use of
> PG_anon_exclusive in subpages. For other anonymous compound
> folios (i.e., hugetlb), only the head page is logically mapped and
> holds this information.
>
> For example, an exclusive, PMD-mapped THP only has PG_anon_exclusive
> set on the head page. When replacing the PMD by a page table full
> of PTEs, PG_anon_exclusive, if set on the head page, will be set on
> all tail pages accordingly. Note that converting from a PTE-mapping
> to a PMD mapping using the same compound page is currently not
> possible and consequently doesn't require care.
>
> If GUP wants to take a reliable pin (FOLL_PIN) on an anonymous page,
> it should only pin if the relevant PG_anon_bit is set. In that case,
^ PG_anon_exclusive bit ?
> the pin will be fully reliable and stay consistent with the pages
> mapped into the page table, as the bit cannot get cleared (e.g., by
> fork(), KSM) while the page is pinned. For anonymous pages that
> are mapped R/W, PG_anon_exclusive can be assumed to always be set
> because such pages cannot possibly be shared.
>
> The page table lock protecting the page table entry is the primary
> synchronization mechanism for PG_anon_exclusive; GUP-fast that does
> not take the PT lock needs special care when trying to clear the
> flag.
>
> Page table entry types and PG_anon_exclusive:
> * Present: PG_anon_exclusive applies.
> * Swap: the information is lost. PG_anon_exclusive was cleared.
> * Migration: the entry holds this information instead.
> PG_anon_exclusive was cleared.
> * Device private: PG_anon_exclusive applies.
> * Device exclusive: PG_anon_exclusive applies.
> * HW Poison: PG_anon_exclusive is stale and not changed.
>
> If the page may be pinned (FOLL_PIN), clearing PG_anon_exclusive is
> not allowed and the flag will stick around until the page is freed
> and folio->mapping is cleared.
Or also if it's unpinned?
> "
>
> We won't be clearing PG_anon_exclusive on destructive unmapping (i.e.,
> zapping) of page table entries, page freeing code will handle that when
> also invalidate page->mapping to not indicate PageAnon() anymore.
> Letting information about exclusivity stick around will be an important
> property when adding sanity checks to unpinning code.
>
> Note that we properly clear the flag in free_pages_prepare() via
> PAGE_FLAGS_CHECK_AT_PREP for each individual subpage of a compound page,
> so there is no need to manually clear the flag.
>
> Signed-off-by: David Hildenbrand <david@xxxxxxxxxx>
Acked-by: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@xxxxxxx>
> --- a/mm/memory.c
> +++ b/mm/memory.c
> @@ -3663,6 +3663,17 @@ vm_fault_t do_swap_page(struct vm_fault *vmf)
> goto out_nomap;
> }
>
> + /*
> + * PG_anon_exclusive reuses PG_mappedtodisk for anon pages. A swap pte
> + * must never point at an anonymous page in the swapcache that is
> + * PG_anon_exclusive. Sanity check that this holds and especially, that
> + * no filesystem set PG_mappedtodisk on a page in the swapcache. Sanity
> + * check after taking the PT lock and making sure that nobody
> + * concurrently faulted in this page and set PG_anon_exclusive.
> + */
> + BUG_ON(!PageAnon(page) && PageMappedToDisk(page));
> + BUG_ON(PageAnon(page) && PageAnonExclusive(page));
> +
Hmm, dunno why not VM_BUG_ON?
> /*
> * Remove the swap entry and conditionally try to free up the swapcache.
> * We're already holding a reference on the page but haven't mapped it
> diff --git a/mm/memremap.c b/mm/memremap.c
> index af0223605e69..4264f78299a8 100644