On Tue, Apr 12, 2022 at 06:41:25PM +0530, Srinivasa Rao Mandadapu wrote:Agree. Will change accordingly. similarly will append lpass_ torx/tx/va mcro device node names.
On 4/12/2022 6:18 PM, Srinivasa Rao Mandadapu wrote:It helps to provide some context about the pins which might not be evident
On 4/12/2022 1:02 AM, Matthias Kaehlcke wrote:As these nodes are part of SC7280, i.e. qcom specific chipset, I feel lpass_
Thanks for your time Matthias!!!
On Mon, Apr 11, 2022 at 07:23:04PM +0530, Srinivasa Rao Mandadapu wrote:These are not part of tlmm pin control section. These are part of
Add LPASS LPI pinctrl node required for Audio functionality on sc7280Shouldn't these nodes be in the PINCTRL section at their respective
based platforms.
Signed-off-by: Srinivasa Rao Mandadapu <quic_srivasam@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Co-developed-by: Venkata Prasad Potturu <quic_potturu@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Venkata Prasad Potturu <quic_potturu@xxxxxxxxxxx>
---
arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sc7280-idp.dtsi | 84
++++++++++++++++++++++++
arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sc7280.dtsi | 107
+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
2 files changed, 191 insertions(+)
diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sc7280-idp.dtsi
b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sc7280-idp.dtsi
index 4ba2274..ea751dc 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sc7280-idp.dtsi
+++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sc7280-idp.dtsi
@@ -238,6 +238,90 @@
modem-init;
};
+&dmic01 {
positions in alphabetical order?
lpass_tlmm section.
In your previous comment you asked to remove &lpass_tlmm. Hence brought
out.
nit: since you are keeping the groups the group names are a bitas dmic01 has both clk and data section, I don't think keeping clk is
generic IMO.
e.g. it is fairly obvious that 'dmic01_clk' refers to a clock pin,
however
just 'dmic01' is a bit vague. You could consider adding the prefix
'lpass_'
to the group names for more clarity.
appropriate here.
is redundant.
from their short names like 'dmic01' or 'rx_swr'. A nice side effect is that
the pins/groups would grouped automatically together in alphabetic ordering.
In terms of 'redundancy' it is similar to 'qup_' prefix for the I2C/SPI/UART
pins.
Okay.
If we add lpass_ to all dmic nodes, some node names are too lengthy.The longest would be like 'lpass_dmic01_sleep' or 'lpass_rx_swr_sleep', which
doesn't seem outrageous.
In any case it's not super important. If it bothers someone enough later
on they can always send a patch that changes it.