Re: [PATCH 1/2] interconnect: qcom: sc7180: Drop IP0 interconnects

[Alex Elder]

On 4/13/22 3:55 PM, Doug Anderson wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Tue, Apr 12, 2022 at 4:20 PM Stephen Boyd <swboyd@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > @@ -519,8 +500,6 @@ static const struct of_device_id qnoc_of_match[] = {
> >            .data = &sc7180_dc_noc},
> >          { .compatible = "qcom,sc7180-gem-noc",
> >            .data = &sc7180_gem_noc},
> > -       { .compatible = "qcom,sc7180-ipa-virt",
> > -         .data = &sc7180_ipa_virt},
> >          { .compatible = "qcom,sc7180-mc-virt",
> >            .data = &sc7180_mc_virt},
> >          { .compatible = "qcom,sc7180-mmss-noc",
>
> I have no objection to ${SUBJECT} change landing and based on all your
> research and Alex's review/testing I think it's good to go.
>
> However, now that you're removed the driver that cared about
> "qcom,sc7180-ipa-virt", should we also be removing it from the
> `bindings/interconnect/qcom,rpmh.yaml` file and the `sc7180.dtsi`
> file? I think that removing it from _either_ the driver (like your
> patch here does) _or_ the sc7180.dtsi file would fix the bug, right?
> ...and then removing it from the yaml would just be cleanup...

That's a good point, I hadn't thought about that but you're right.

I think we were too pleased about identifying the problem and
proving it could happen (and cause a crash), so we didn't think
hard enough about this other piece.

Stephen, I think you should re-spin the series and add the
proper change to the binding.  You can keep the tags I gave
before.

I've got a note to follow up with similar changes to other
platforms where the interconnect driver includes resource "IP0"
and will plan to do what Doug suggests there too.

					-Alex

> -Doug