Re: [PATCH v2 03/12] cxl/core: Refactor a cxl_lock_class() out of cxl_nested_lock()

[Dan Williams]

On Wed, Apr 13, 2022 at 2:40 AM Peter Zijlstra <peterz@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
>
> *Completely* untested (I wouldn't know where to begin and probably odn't
> have the hardware anyway), and known incomplete.
>
> What's wrong with something like this then?
>

I'll give it a shot, I think it solves all the cringeworthy aspects of
what I proposed.