[PATCH 5.4 474/475] cpuidle: PSCI: Move the `has_lpi` check to the beginning of the function

[Greg Kroah-Hartman]

From: Mario Limonciello <mario.limonciello@xxxxxxx>

commit 01f6c7338ce267959975da65d86ba34f44d54220 upstream.

Currently the first thing checked is whether the PCSI cpu_suspend function
has been initialized.

Another change will be overloading `acpi_processor_ffh_lpi_probe` and
calling it sooner.  So make the `has_lpi` check the first thing checked
to prepare for that change.

Reviewed-by: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@xxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Mario Limonciello <mario.limonciello@xxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@xxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
 arch/arm64/kernel/cpuidle.c |    6 +++---
 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

--- a/arch/arm64/kernel/cpuidle.c
+++ b/arch/arm64/kernel/cpuidle.c
@@ -53,6 +53,9 @@ static int psci_acpi_cpu_init_idle(unsig
 	struct acpi_lpi_state *lpi;
 	struct acpi_processor *pr = per_cpu(processors, cpu);
 
+	if (unlikely(!pr || !pr->flags.has_lpi))
+		return -EINVAL;
+
 	/*
 	 * If the PSCI cpu_suspend function hook has not been initialized
 	 * idle states must not be enabled, so bail out
@@ -60,9 +63,6 @@ static int psci_acpi_cpu_init_idle(unsig
 	if (!psci_ops.cpu_suspend)
 		return -EOPNOTSUPP;
 
-	if (unlikely(!pr || !pr->flags.has_lpi))
-		return -EINVAL;
-
 	count = pr->power.count - 1;
 	if (count <= 0)
 		return -ENODEV;