Re: [PATCH] sched/fair: Revise comment about lb decision matrix
From: Tao Zhou
Date: Thu Apr 14 2022 - 13:26:40 EST
On Thu, Apr 14, 2022 at 12:33:06PM +0200,
Dietmar Eggemann wrote:
> On 03/04/2022 19:59, Tao Zhou wrote:
> > If busiest group type is group_misfit_task, the local
> > group type must be group_has_spare according to below
> > code in update_sd_pick_busiest():
> >
> > if (sgs->group_type == group_misfit_task &&
> > (!capacity_greater(capacity_of(env->dst_cpu), sg->sgc->max_capacity) ||
> > sds->local_stat.group_type != group_has_spare))
> > return false;
> >
> > group type imbalanced and overloaded and fully_busy are filtered in here.
> > misfit and asym are filtered before in update_sg_lb_stats().
> > So, change the decision matrix to:
> >
> > busiest \ local has_spare fully_busy misfit asym imbalanced overloaded
> > has_spare nr_idle balanced N/A N/A balanced balanced
> > fully_busy nr_idle nr_idle N/A N/A balanced balanced
> > misfit_task force N/A N/A N/A *N/A* *N/A*
> > asym_packing force force N/A N/A force force
> > imbalanced force force N/A N/A force force
> > overloaded force force N/A N/A force avg_load
> > ---
> > kernel/sched/fair.c | 2 +-
> > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/kernel/sched/fair.c b/kernel/sched/fair.c
> > index 5146163bfabb..5765d96202c7 100644
> > --- a/kernel/sched/fair.c
> > +++ b/kernel/sched/fair.c
> > @@ -9441,7 +9441,7 @@ static inline void calculate_imbalance(struct lb_env *env, struct sd_lb_stats *s
> > * busiest \ local has_spare fully_busy misfit asym imbalanced overloaded
> > * has_spare nr_idle balanced N/A N/A balanced balanced
> > * fully_busy nr_idle nr_idle N/A N/A balanced balanced
> > - * misfit_task force N/A N/A N/A force force
> > + * misfit_task force N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A
> > * asym_packing force force N/A N/A force force
> > * imbalanced force force N/A N/A force force
> > * overloaded force force N/A N/A force avg_load
>
> You should put people you find in `./scripts/get_maintainer.pl
> kernel/sched/fair.c` on To/Cc to attract more attention.
>
> Otherwise, LGTM.
>
> Reviewed-by: Dietmar Eggemann <dietmar.eggemann@xxxxxxx>
I will send based on latest rc version..
Thanks,
Tao