Re: [PATCH net-next 06/12] net: dsa: rzn1-a5psw: add Renesas RZ/N1 advanced 5 port switch driver

[Clément Léger]

Le Fri, 15 Apr 2022 14:05:24 +0300,
Vladimir Oltean <olteanv@xxxxxxxxx> a écrit :

> On Fri, Apr 15, 2022 at 01:55:03PM +0300, Vladimir Oltean wrote:
> > > > The selftests don't cover nearly enough, but just to make sure that they
> > > > pass for your switch, when you use 2 switch ports as h1 and h2 (hosts),
> > > > and 2 ports as swp1 and swp2? There's surprisingly little that you do on
> > > > .port_bridge_join, I need to study the code more.  
> > > 
> > > Port isolation is handled by using a pattern matcher which is enabled
> > > for each port at setup. If set, the port packet will only be forwarded
> > > to the CPU port. When bridging is needed, the pattern matching is
> > > disabled and thus, the packets are forwarded between all the ports that
> > > are enabled in the bridge.  
> > 
> > Is there some public documentation for this pattern matcher?  
> 
> Again, I realize I haven't made it clear what concerns me here.
> On ->port_bridge_join() and ->port_bridge_leave(), the "bridge" is given
> to you as argument. 2 ports may join br0, and 2 ports may join br1.
> You disregard the "bridge" argument. So you enable forwarding between
> br0 and br1. What I'd like to see is what the hardware can do in terms
> of this "pattern matching", to improve on this situation.

Yes, you are right, the driver currently won't support 2 differents
bridges. Either I add checks to support explicitely only one, or I add
support for multiple bridges. This would probably requires to use VLAN
internally to separate trafic.

-- 
Clément Léger,
Embedded Linux and Kernel engineer at Bootlin
https://bootlin.com