Re: [PATCH] f2fs: use flush command instead of FUA for zoned device

From: Christoph Hellwig
Date: Wed Apr 20 2022 - 01:16:32 EST

Next message: Tan Tee Min: "Re: [PATCH net 1/1] net: stmmac: add fsleep() in HW Rx timestamp checking loop"
Previous message: Stephen Rothwell: "linux-next: manual merge of the kunit-next tree with the thunderbolt tree"
In reply to: Jaegeuk Kim: "[PATCH] f2fs: use flush command instead of FUA for zoned device"
Next in thread: Jaegeuk Kim: "Re: [PATCH] f2fs: use flush command instead of FUA for zoned device"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

On Tue, Apr 19, 2022 at 02:57:03PM -0700, Jaegeuk Kim wrote:
> The block layer for zoned disk can reorder the FUA'ed IOs. Let's use flush
> command to keep the write order.

The block layer can reorder all commands. Given that FUA only affects
the command itself that should not matter. What is this trying to fix?

Next message: Tan Tee Min: "Re: [PATCH net 1/1] net: stmmac: add fsleep() in HW Rx timestamp checking loop"
Previous message: Stephen Rothwell: "linux-next: manual merge of the kunit-next tree with the thunderbolt tree"
In reply to: Jaegeuk Kim: "[PATCH] f2fs: use flush command instead of FUA for zoned device"
Next in thread: Jaegeuk Kim: "Re: [PATCH] f2fs: use flush command instead of FUA for zoned device"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]