Re: [PATCH] soc: ti: pm33xx: using pm_runtime_resume_and_get instead of pm_runtime_get_sync

From: Tony Lindgren
Date: Mon Apr 25 2022 - 02:42:13 EST


* Nishanth Menon <nm@xxxxxx> [220422 18:37]:
> On 06:30-20220418, cgel.zte@xxxxxxxxx wrote:
> > From: Minghao Chi <chi.minghao@xxxxxxxxxx>
> >
> > Using pm_runtime_resume_and_get is more appropriate
> > for simplifing code
> >
> > Reported-by: Zeal Robot <zealci@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > Signed-off-by: Minghao Chi <chi.minghao@xxxxxxxxxx>
>
> Tony: Could you check?

Looks good to me:

Reviewed-by: Tony Lindgren <tony@xxxxxxxxxxx>