Re: [PATCH] drm/nouveau/kms/gv100: use static for gv100_disp_core_mthd_[base|sor]

[Lyude Paul]

Reviewed-by: Lyude Paul <lyude@xxxxxxxxxx>

Will push to the appropriate branch in a bit

On Fri, 2022-04-22 at 14:51 -0400, Tom Rix wrote:
> Sparse reports these issues
> coregv100.c:27:1: warning: symbol 'gv100_disp_core_mthd_base' was not
> declared. Should it be static?
> coregv100.c:43:1: warning: symbol 'gv100_disp_core_mthd_sor' was not
> declared. Should it be static?
> 
> These variables are only used in coregv100.c.  Single file use
> variables should be static, so add static to their storage-class specifier.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Tom Rix <trix@xxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
>  drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nvkm/engine/disp/coregv100.c | 4 ++--
>  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nvkm/engine/disp/coregv100.c
> b/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nvkm/engine/disp/coregv100.c
> index 448a515057c7..1d333c484a49 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nvkm/engine/disp/coregv100.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nvkm/engine/disp/coregv100.c
> @@ -23,7 +23,7 @@
>  
>  #include <subdev/timer.h>
>  
> -const struct nv50_disp_mthd_list
> +static const struct nv50_disp_mthd_list
>  gv100_disp_core_mthd_base = {
>         .mthd = 0x0000,
>         .addr = 0x000000,
> @@ -39,7 +39,7 @@ gv100_disp_core_mthd_base = {
>         }
>  };
>  
> -const struct nv50_disp_mthd_list
> +static const struct nv50_disp_mthd_list
>  gv100_disp_core_mthd_sor = {
>         .mthd = 0x0020,
>         .addr = 0x000020,

-- 
Cheers,
 Lyude Paul (she/her)
 Software Engineer at Red Hat