RE: [EXT] Re: [PATCH] media: amphion: ensure the buffer count is not less than min_buffer

From: Ming Qian
Date: Wed Apr 27 2022 - 05:37:55 EST


> From: Hans Verkuil [mailto:hverkuil-cisco@xxxxxxxxx]
> Sent: Wednesday, April 27, 2022 3:25 PM
> To: Ming Qian <ming.qian@xxxxxxx>; mchehab@xxxxxxxxxx;
> shawnguo@xxxxxxxxxx
> Cc: robh+dt@xxxxxxxxxx; s.hauer@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx; kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx;
> festevam@xxxxxxxxx; dl-linux-imx <linux-imx@xxxxxxx>; Aisheng Dong
> <aisheng.dong@xxxxxxx>; linux-media@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx;
> linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; linux-arm-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Subject: Re: [EXT] Re: [PATCH] media: amphion: ensure the buffer count is not
> less than min_buffer
>
> Caution: EXT Email
>
> On 27/04/2022 09:01, Ming Qian wrote:
> >> From: Hans Verkuil [mailto:hverkuil-cisco@xxxxxxxxx]
> >> Sent: Wednesday, April 27, 2022 2:38 PM
> >> To: Ming Qian <ming.qian@xxxxxxx>; mchehab@xxxxxxxxxx;
> >> shawnguo@xxxxxxxxxx
> >> Cc: robh+dt@xxxxxxxxxx; s.hauer@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx;
> >> kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx; festevam@xxxxxxxxx; dl-linux-imx
> >> <linux-imx@xxxxxxx>; Aisheng Dong <aisheng.dong@xxxxxxx>;
> >> linux-media@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx;
> >> linux-arm-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> >> Subject: [EXT] Re: [PATCH] media: amphion: ensure the buffer count is
> >> not less than min_buffer
> >>
> >> Caution: EXT Email
> >>
> >> Hi Ming Qian,
> >>
> >> On 22/03/2022 09:28, Ming Qian wrote:
> >>> the output buffer count should >= min_buffer_out the capture buffer
> >>> count should >= min_buffer_cap
> >>>
> >>> Signed-off-by: Ming Qian <ming.qian@xxxxxxx>
> >>> ---
> >>> drivers/media/platform/amphion/vpu_v4l2.c | 4 ++++
> >>> 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+)
> >>>
> >>> diff --git a/drivers/media/platform/amphion/vpu_v4l2.c
> >>> b/drivers/media/platform/amphion/vpu_v4l2.c
> >>> index cbf3315605a9..72a0544f4da3 100644
> >>> --- a/drivers/media/platform/amphion/vpu_v4l2.c
> >>> +++ b/drivers/media/platform/amphion/vpu_v4l2.c
> >>> @@ -355,6 +355,10 @@ static int vpu_vb2_queue_setup(struct
> vb2_queue
> >> *vq,
> >>> return 0;
> >>> }
> >>>
> >>> + if (V4L2_TYPE_IS_OUTPUT(vq->type))
> >>> + *buf_count = max_t(unsigned int, *buf_count,
> >> inst->min_buffer_out);
> >>> + else
> >>> + *buf_count = max_t(unsigned int, *buf_count,
> >>> + inst->min_buffer_cap);
> >>
> >> I noticed that min_buffer_out/cap is set to 2, but min_buffers_needed
> >> is set to 1. Wouldn't it make more sense to set min_buffers_needed to
> >> 2 as well?
> >>
> >> If you do that, then the vb2 core will already take care of ensuring
> >> that the buf_count is adjusted.
> >>
> >> If you *do* have to do this manually, then you need to place the
> >> whole if-else under 'if (!*num_planes) {', otherwise it will mess up
> >> the VIDIOC_CREATE_BUFS ioctl. See the queue_setup in
> >> include/media/videobuf2-core.h documentation for the sordid details.
> >>
> >> Regards,
> >>
> >> Hans
> >>
> >
> > Hi Hans,
> > I want to make the vpu start when 1 frames is queued, so I set the
> min_buffers_needed to 1.
> > And the min_buffer_cap may be changed when a source change event is
> triggered. So in most case, it will be larger than 2.
>
> Ah, I only grepped for min_buffer_out, not _cap, so I missed that that one isn't
> constant.
>
> > I'll make a v2 patch that place the whole if-else under 'if (!*num_planes)
> {'
>
Hi Hans,
I send a v2 patch.
But I think the v1 is OK, as the full code has already guaranteed the condition ` if (!*num_planes)`,

if (*plane_count) {
... ...
return 0;
}
if (V4L2_TYPE_IS_OUTPUT(vq->type))
*buf_count = max_t(unsigned int, *buf_count, inst->min_buffer_out);
else
*buf_count = max_t(unsigned int, *buf_count, inst->min_buffer_cap);

Ming

> Great, thank you!
>
> Hans
>
> > Thanks for your reminder
> >
> > Ming
> >
> >>> *plane_count = cur_fmt->num_planes;
> >>> for (i = 0; i < cur_fmt->num_planes; i++)
> >>> psize[i] = cur_fmt->sizeimage[i];
> >