Re: [PATCH] nvmem: qfprom: using pm_runtime_resume_and_get instead of pm_runtime_get_sync

[Srinivas Kandagatla]

On 11/04/2022 02:40, cgel.zte@xxxxxxxxx wrote:
> From: Minghao Chi <chi.minghao@xxxxxxxxxx>
>
> Using pm_runtime_resume_and_get is more appropriate
> for simplifing code
>
> Reported-by: Zeal Robot <zealci@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Signed-off-by: Minghao Chi <chi.minghao@xxxxxxxxxx>

Applied thanks,

--srini
> ---
>   drivers/nvmem/qfprom.c | 3 +--
>   1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/nvmem/qfprom.c b/drivers/nvmem/qfprom.c
> index 162132c7dab9..c1e893c8a247 100644
> --- a/drivers/nvmem/qfprom.c
> +++ b/drivers/nvmem/qfprom.c
> @@ -217,9 +217,8 @@ static int qfprom_enable_fuse_blowing(const struct qfprom_priv *priv,
>   		goto err_clk_rate_set;
>   	}
>   
> -	ret = pm_runtime_get_sync(priv->dev);
> +	ret = pm_runtime_resume_and_get(priv->dev);
>   	if (ret < 0) {
> -		pm_runtime_put_noidle(priv->dev);
>   		dev_err(priv->dev, "Failed to enable power-domain\n");
>   		goto err_reg_enable;
>   	}