Re: [PATCH 3/3] dt-bindings: arm: msm: Convert kpss-gcc driver Documentation to yaml

[Ansuel Smith]

On Fri, Apr 29, 2022 at 10:43:21PM +0200, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> On 29/04/2022 17:57, Ansuel Smith wrote:
> > On Fri, Apr 29, 2022 at 10:53:16AM -0500, Rob Herring wrote:
> >> On Fri, 29 Apr 2022 14:17:39 +0200, Ansuel Smith wrote:
> >>> Convert kpss-gcc driver Documentation to yaml.
> >>>
> >>> Signed-off-by: Ansuel Smith <ansuelsmth@xxxxxxxxx>
> >>> ---
> >>>  .../bindings/arm/msm/qcom,kpss-gcc.txt        | 44 -------------
> >>>  .../bindings/arm/msm/qcom,kpss-gcc.yaml       | 63 +++++++++++++++++++
> >>>  2 files changed, 63 insertions(+), 44 deletions(-)
> >>>  delete mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/msm/qcom,kpss-gcc.txt
> >>>  create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/msm/qcom,kpss-gcc.yaml
> >>>
> >>
> >> My bot found errors running 'make DT_CHECKER_FLAGS=-m dt_binding_check'
> >> on your patch (DT_CHECKER_FLAGS is new in v5.13):
> >>
> >> yamllint warnings/errors:
> >>
> >> dtschema/dtc warnings/errors:
> >> /builds/robherring/linux-dt-review/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/msm/qcom,kpss-gcc.yaml: properties: '#clock-cells' is a dependency of 'clock-output-names'
> > 
> 
> The patches were previously sent (even as v6) and somehow the history,
> changelog and references disappeared...
> 

Mhh with split how this should be handled? Putting the relevant changes
in the cover letter?

> > Erm how to fix this? I can't do a 1:1 conversion if the source was
> > wrong and also have no bot warning.
> > Or I should just push an additional patch to fix this error after the
> > conversion?
> 
> Didn't we agree that original bindings were not in good shape? Yet the
> questions raised with your v6 remain actually not answered, till the bot
> complains.
> 
> Please do not send the bindings which do not pass dt_binding_check.
> 
> Best regards,
> Krzysztof

In v6 the last mail were with the idea of sending separate series with
minimal changes and it was mention that it was a good idea to send only
conversion and then send the changes with the conversion series.

Finally got the message. I should NEVER send patch with warning from
dt_binding_check.

-- 
	Ansuel