Re: [next] i386: kunit: ASSERTION FAILED at mm/kfence/kfence_test.c:547

[John Ogness]

On 2022-05-02, Petr Mladek <pmladek@xxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> My proposal would be to fix the tracepoint like so:
>> 
>>  | --- a/kernel/printk/printk.c
>>  | +++ b/kernel/printk/printk.c
>>  | @@ -2002,8 +2002,6 @@ static void call_console_driver(struct console *con, const char *text, size_t le
>>  |  {
>>  |  	size_t dropped_len;
>>  |  
>>  | -	trace_console_rcuidle(text, len);
>>  | -
>>  |  	if (con->dropped && dropped_text) {
>>  |  		dropped_len = snprintf(dropped_text, DROPPED_TEXT_MAX,
>>  |  				       "** %lu printk messages dropped **\n",
>>  | @@ -2178,6 +2176,8 @@ static u16 printk_sprint(char *text, u16 size, int facility,
>>  |  		}
>>  |  	}
>>  |  
>>  | +	trace_console_rcuidle(text, text_len);
>>  | +
>>  |  	return text_len;
>>  |  }
>> 
>> This fixes the KFENCE and KCSAN tests.
>> 
>> Unless I hear objections, I'll prepare a patch explaining why we need to
>> fix the tracepoint.
>
> It makes perfect sense to me.

This is the easiest place for it. However, it should be clear that in
the context of trace_console_rcuidle(), the message is not yet visible
to any readers. The message _will_ get committed and definitely _will_
become visible at some point. But it is not (yet) visible at _this_
point. Maybe that is OK for what it is being used for.

If trace_console_rcuidle() must be called at the point of visibility for
readers, it becomes more complicated.

John