Re: [PATCH 5/5] bus: mhi: host: Remove redundant dma_wmb() before ctx wp update

[Loic Poulain]

Hi Mani,

On Mon, 2 May 2022 at 12:42, Manivannan Sadhasivam
<manivannan.sadhasivam@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> The endpoint device will only read the context wp when the host rings
> the doorbell.

Are we sure about this statement? what if we update ctxt_wp while the
device is still processing the previous ring? is it going to continue
processing the new ctxt_wp or wait for a new doorbell interrupt? what
about burst mode in which we don't ring at all (ring_db is no-op)?

> And moreover the doorbell write is using writel(). This
> guarantess that the prior writes will be completed before ringing
> doorbell.

Yes but the barrier is to ensure that descriptor/ring content is
updated before we actually pass it to device ownership, it's not about
ordering with the doorbell write, but the memory coherent ones.

>
> So there is no need of an additional dma_wmb() to order the coherent
> memory writes w.r.t each other. Even if the writes gets reordered, it
> won't affect the endpoint device.
>
> Cc: Loic Poulain <loic.poulain@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Signed-off-by: Manivannan Sadhasivam <manivannan.sadhasivam@xxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
>  drivers/bus/mhi/host/main.c | 5 -----
>  1 file changed, 5 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/bus/mhi/host/main.c b/drivers/bus/mhi/host/main.c
> index 966ffc2458b9..6706a82d3aa8 100644
> --- a/drivers/bus/mhi/host/main.c
> +++ b/drivers/bus/mhi/host/main.c
> @@ -138,11 +138,6 @@ void mhi_ring_chan_db(struct mhi_controller *mhi_cntrl,
>
>         db = ring->iommu_base + (ring->wp - ring->base);
>
> -       /*
> -        * Writes to the new ring element must be visible to the hardware
> -        * before letting h/w know there is new element to fetch.
> -        */
> -       dma_wmb();
>         *ring->ctxt_wp = cpu_to_le64(db);
>
>         mhi_chan->db_cfg.ring_db(mhi_cntrl, &mhi_chan->db_cfg,
> --
> 2.25.1
>

Regards,
Loic