Re: [PATCH v3 00/12] KVM: SVM: Fix soft int/ex re-injection

[Maxim Levitsky]

On Tue, 2022-05-03 at 18:48 +0000, Sean Christopherson wrote:
> On Mon, May 02, 2022, Maciej S. Szmigiero wrote:
> > From: "Maciej S. Szmigiero" <maciej.szmigiero@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > 
> > This series is an updated version of Sean's SVM soft interrupt/exception
> > re-injection fixes patch set, which in turn extended and generalized my
> > nSVM L1 -> L2 event injection fixes series.
> > 
> > Detailed list of changes in this version:
> > * "Downgraded" the commit affecting !nrips CPUs to just drop nested SVM
> > support for such parts instead of SVM support in general,
> > 
> > * Removed the BUG_ON() from svm_inject_irq() completely, instead of
> > replacing it with WARN() - Maxim has pointed out it can still be triggered
> > by userspace via KVM_SET_VCPU_EVENTS,
> > 
> > * Updated the new KVM self-test to switch to an alternate IDT before attempting
> > a second L1 -> L2 injection to cause intervening NPF again,
> > 
> > * Added a fix for L1/L2 NMI state confusion during L1 -> L2 NMI re-injection,
> > 
> > * Updated the new KVM self-test to also check for the NMI injection
> > scenario being fixed (that was found causing issues with a real guest),
> > 
> > * Changed "kvm_inj_virq" trace event "reinjected" field type to bool,
> > 
> > * Integrated the fix from patch 5 for nested_vmcb02_prepare_control() call
> > argument in svm_set_nested_state() to patch 1,
> > 
> > * Collected Maxim's "Reviewed-by:" for tracepoint patches.
> > 
> > Previous versions:
> > Sean's v2:
> > https://lore.kernel.org/kvm/20220423021411.784383-1-seanjc@xxxxxxxxxx
> > 
> > Sean's v1:
> > https://lore.kernel.org/kvm/20220402010903.727604-1-seanjc@xxxxxxxxxx
> > 
> > My original series:
> > https://lore.kernel.org/kvm/cover.1646944472.git.maciej.szmigiero@xxxxxxxxxx
> > 
> > Maciej S. Szmigiero (4):
> >   KVM: nSVM: Sync next_rip field from vmcb12 to vmcb02
> >   KVM: SVM: Don't BUG if userspace injects an interrupt with GIF=0
> 
> LOL, this should win some kind of award for most ridiculous multi-author patch :-)
> 
> Series looks good, thanks!
> 
Well I think I, Paolo, and you hold the record for this, when we fixed the AVIC inhibition
races, remember?

Patch series also looks overall good to me, but I haven't checked everything to be honest.

Best regards,
	Maxim Levitsky