Re: [PATCH v5 3/3] x86/tdx: Add Quote generation support
From: Kai Huang
Date: Thu May 05 2022 - 06:50:27 EST
> + /* Submit GetQuote Request */
> + ret = tdx_get_quote_hypercall(buf);
> + if (ret) {
> + pr_err("GetQuote hypercall failed, status:%lx\n", ret);
> + ret = -EIO;
> + goto free_entry;
> + }
> +
> + /* Add current quote entry to quote_list */
> + add_quote_entry(entry);
> +
> + /* Wait for attestation completion */
> + ret = wait_for_completion_interruptible(&entry->compl);
> + if (ret < 0) {
> + ret = -EIO;
> + goto del_entry;
> + }
This is misuse of wait_for_completion_interruptible().
xxx_interruptible() essentially means this operation can be interrupted by
signal. Using xxx_interruptible() in driver IOCTL essentially means when it
returns due to signal, the IOCTL should return -EINTR to let userspace know that
your application received some signal needs handling, and this IOCTL isn't
finished and you should retry. So here we should return -EINTR (and cleanup all
staff has been done) when wait_for_completion_interruptible() returns -
ERESTARTSYS (in fact, it returns only -ERESTARTSYS or 0).
Since normally userspace application just ignore signals, and in this particular
case, asking userspace to retry just makes things more complicated to handle, I
think you can just use wait_for_completion_killable(), which only returns when
the application receives signal that it is going to be killed.
> +
> + /* Copy output data back to user buffer */
> + if (copy_to_user((void __user *)quote_req.buf, buf->vmaddr,
> quote_req.len))
> + ret = -EFAULT;
> +
> +del_entry:
> + del_quote_entry(entry);
> +free_entry:
> + free_quote_entry(entry);
As I (and Isaku) mentioned before, when wait_for_completion_killable() returns
with error, you cannot just convert the buffer to private and free it. The VMM
is still owning it (IN_FLIGHT).
One way to handle is you can put those buffers that are still owned by VMM to a
new list, and have some kernel thread to periodically check buffer's status and
free those are already released by VMM. I haven't thought thoroughly, so maybe
there's better way to handle, though.
--
Thanks,
-Kai