Re: [PATCH 1/3] nvme: introduce bit 5 of smart critical warning

From: Christoph Hellwig
Date: Tue May 10 2022 - 01:49:18 EST

Next message: Guixin Liu: "[PATCH] uio: Replace mutex info_lock with percpu_ref"
Previous message: Alistair Popple: "Re: RFC: Memory Tiering Kernel Interfaces"
Next in thread: zhenwei pi: "Re: Re: [PATCH 1/3] nvme: introduce bit 5 of smart critical warning"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

On Sat, May 07, 2022 at 02:50:24PM +0800, zhenwei pi wrote:
> According to NVM Express v1.4, Section 5.14.1.2 ("SMART / Health
> Information"), introduce bit 5 for "Persistent Memory Region has become
> read-only or unreliable".

Given that Linux does not support the PMR, do we really need this?

Next message: Guixin Liu: "[PATCH] uio: Replace mutex info_lock with percpu_ref"
Previous message: Alistair Popple: "Re: RFC: Memory Tiering Kernel Interfaces"
Next in thread: zhenwei pi: "Re: Re: [PATCH 1/3] nvme: introduce bit 5 of smart critical warning"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]