Re: [PATCH 1/7] irqchip/stm32-exti: set_affinity return IRQ_SET_MASK_OK_DONE if no parent

[Marc Zyngier]

Antonio,

On Tue, 10 May 2022 17:41:17 +0100,
Antonio Borneo <antonio.borneo@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> 
> From: Ludovic Barre <ludovic.barre@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> 
> If no parent, there is no specific action to do in
> stm32 irqchip, and so return IRQ_SET_MASK_OK_DONE.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Ludovic Barre <ludovic.barre@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> Signed-off-by: Antonio Borneo <antonio.borneo@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
>  drivers/irqchip/irq-stm32-exti.c | 2 +-
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/irqchip/irq-stm32-exti.c b/drivers/irqchip/irq-stm32-exti.c
> index 9d18f47040eb..10c9c742c216 100644
> --- a/drivers/irqchip/irq-stm32-exti.c
> +++ b/drivers/irqchip/irq-stm32-exti.c
> @@ -614,7 +614,7 @@ static int stm32_exti_h_set_affinity(struct irq_data *d,
>  	if (d->parent_data->chip)
>  		return irq_chip_set_affinity_parent(d, dest, force);
>  
> -	return -EINVAL;
> +	return IRQ_SET_MASK_OK_DONE;
>  }
>  
>  static int __maybe_unused stm32_exti_h_suspend(void)

<rant>
Can you *please* use a cover-letter when sending more that a single
patch? I expect there is an overarching motive to this series. Where
is it described?

Also, please look at the way the subject lines are written for most
irqchip patches:

irqchip/foo: Frobify the bar callback return value

Note the capital letter after the ':', and the fact that it starts
with a verb. Here, I would have liked to see:

irqchip/stm32-exti: Fix set_affinity() return value

and leave the meat of the description to the commit log (instead of
saying the exact same thing twice).
</rant>

Thanks,

	M.

-- 
Without deviation from the norm, progress is not possible.