Re: [akpm-mm:mm-unstable 175/431] mm/madvise.c:632:36: error: implicit declaration of function 'is_swapin_error_entry'

From: Andrew Morton
Date: Tue May 10 2022 - 17:43:50 EST

Next message: Minchan Kim: "Re: [PATCH v3] mm: don't be stuck to rmap lock on reclaim path"
Previous message: Doug Anderson: "Re: [RFC PATCH] drm/edid: drm_add_modes_noedid() should set lowest resolution as preferred"
In reply to: kernel test robot: "[akpm-mm:mm-unstable 175/431] mm/madvise.c:632:36: error: implicit declaration of function 'is_swapin_error_entry'"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

On Wed, 11 May 2022 04:42:45 +0800 kernel test robot <lkp@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> Note: the akpm-mm/mm-unstable HEAD 584a50635cc1deee2eeab5a17dfdcf9db7add21b builds fine.
> It only hurts bisectability.

Well drat. 8296b60c4ec is in mm-stable and addressing this would
require a rebase.

Next message: Minchan Kim: "Re: [PATCH v3] mm: don't be stuck to rmap lock on reclaim path"
Previous message: Doug Anderson: "Re: [RFC PATCH] drm/edid: drm_add_modes_noedid() should set lowest resolution as preferred"
In reply to: kernel test robot: "[akpm-mm:mm-unstable 175/431] mm/madvise.c:632:36: error: implicit declaration of function 'is_swapin_error_entry'"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]