Re: [PATCH] RISC-V: Remove IORESOURCE_BUSY flag for no-map reserved memory

From: Xianting Tian
Date: Wed May 11 2022 - 08:43:40 EST



在 2022/5/11 下午8:37, Xianting Tian 写道:

在 2022/5/11 下午8:27, David Hildenbrand 写道:
On 11.05.22 13:24, Xianting Tian wrote:
Commit 00ab027a3b82 ("RISC-V: Add kernel image sections to the resource tree")
added IORESOURCE_BUSY flag for no-map reserved memory, this casued
devm_ioremap_resource() failed for the no-map reserved memory in subsequent
operations of related driver, so remove the IORESOURCE_BUSY flag.

The code to reproduce the issue,
dts:
    mem0: memory@a0000000 {
                 reg = <0x0 0xa0000000 0 0x1000000>;
                 no-map;
         };

    &test {
        status = "okay";
        memory-region = <&mem0>;
    };

code:
    np = of_parse_phandle(pdev->dev.of_node, "memory-region", 0);
    ret = of_address_to_resource(np, 0, &r);
    base = devm_ioremap_resource(&pdev->dev, &r);
    // base = -EBUSY

Fixes: 00ab027a3b82 ("RISC-V: Add kernel image sections to the resource tree")
Reported-by: Huaming Jiang <jianghuaming.jhm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Reviewed-by: Guo Ren <guoren@xxxxxxxxxx>
CC: Nick Kossifidis <mick@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Xianting Tian <xianting.tian@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
  arch/riscv/kernel/setup.c | 2 +-
  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/arch/riscv/kernel/setup.c b/arch/riscv/kernel/setup.c
index 834eb652a7b9..71f2966b1474 100644
--- a/arch/riscv/kernel/setup.c
+++ b/arch/riscv/kernel/setup.c
@@ -214,7 +214,7 @@ static void __init init_resources(void)
            if (unlikely(memblock_is_nomap(region))) {
              res->name = "Reserved";
-            res->flags = IORESOURCE_MEM | IORESOURCE_BUSY;
+            res->flags = IORESOURCE_MEM;
          } else {
              res->name = "System RAM";
              res->flags = IORESOURCE_SYSTEM_RAM | IORESOURCE_BUSY;
I assume the "Reserved" part is essentially unused by the kernel correct?

I think we may use it, actually we found the issue in our product after merged kdump functionality.

Actually, the code didn't add IORESOURCE_BUSY for no-map reserved memory before 00ab027a3b82 merged,  so it is a typo for commit 00ab027a3b82 to add IORESOURCE_BUSY?

This is arm64 code, which doesn't add IORESOURCE_BUSY for no-map reserved memory,

arch/arm64/kernel/setup.c

        for_each_mem_region(region) {
                res = &standard_resources[i++];
                if (memblock_is_nomap(region)) {
                        res->name  = "reserved";
                        res->flags = IORESOURCE_MEM;
                        res->start = __pfn_to_phys(memblock_region_reserved_base_pfn(region));
                        res->end = __pfn_to_phys(memblock_region_reserved_end_pfn(region)) - 1;