Re: [PATCH] Bluetooth: Fix Adv Monitor msft_add/remove_monitor_sync()

From: Luiz Augusto von Dentz
Date: Wed May 11 2022 - 17:23:53 EST


Hi Manish,

On Mon, May 9, 2022 at 2:05 PM Manish Mandlik <mmandlik@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> Do not call skb_pull() in msft_add_monitor_sync() as
> msft_le_monitor_advertisement_cb() expects 'status' to be
> part of the skb.
>
> Same applies for msft_remove_monitor_sync().
>
> Signed-off-by: Manish Mandlik <mmandlik@xxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
>
> net/bluetooth/msft.c | 2 --
> 1 file changed, 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/net/bluetooth/msft.c b/net/bluetooth/msft.c
> index f43994523b1f..9990924719aa 100644
> --- a/net/bluetooth/msft.c
> +++ b/net/bluetooth/msft.c
> @@ -387,7 +387,6 @@ static int msft_remove_monitor_sync(struct hci_dev *hdev,
> return PTR_ERR(skb);
>
> status = skb->data[0];
> - skb_pull(skb, 1);
>
> msft_le_cancel_monitor_advertisement_cb(hdev, status, hdev->msft_opcode,
> skb);
> @@ -506,7 +505,6 @@ static int msft_add_monitor_sync(struct hci_dev *hdev,
> return PTR_ERR(skb);
>
> status = skb->data[0];
> - skb_pull(skb, 1);

Well if it expects it to be part of the skb then there is no reason to
pass it as argument in addition to the skb itself.

> msft_le_monitor_advertisement_cb(hdev, status, hdev->msft_opcode, skb);
>
> --
> 2.36.0.512.ge40c2bad7a-goog
>


--
Luiz Augusto von Dentz