Re: [PATCH v3 1/4] iommu/vt-d: Implement domain ops for attach_dev_pasid

[Baolu Lu]

Hi Jason,

On 2022/5/12 01:00, Jason Gunthorpe wrote:
> > Consolidate pasid programming into dev_set_pasid() then called by both
> > intel_svm_attach_dev_pasid() and intel_iommu_attach_dev_pasid(), right?
> I was only suggesting that really dev_attach_pasid() op is misnamed,
> it should be called set_dev_pasid() and act like a set, not a paired
> attach/detach - same as the non-PASID ops.

So,

  "set_dev_pasid(domain, device, pasid)" equals to dev_attach_pasid()

and

  "set_dev_pasid(NULL, device, pasid)" equals to dev_detach_pasid()?

do I understand it right?

Best regards,
baolu