Re: [PATCH 2/2] mm: pvmw: check possible huge PMD map by transhuge_vma_suitable()

[Matthew Wilcox]

On Thu, May 12, 2022 at 10:45:51AM -0700, Yang Shi wrote:
> IIUC PVMW checks if the vma is possibly huge PMD mapped by
> transparent_hugepage_active() and "pvmw->nr_pages >= HPAGE_PMD_NR".
> 
> Actually pvmw->nr_pages is returned by compound_nr() or
> folio_nr_pages(), so the page should be THP as long as "pvmw->nr_pages
> >= HPAGE_PMD_NR".  And it is guaranteed THP is allocated for valid VMA
> in the first place.  But it may be not PMD mapped if the VMA is file
> VMA and it is not properly aligned.  The transhuge_vma_suitable()
> is used to do such check, so replace transparent_hugepage_active() to
> it, which is too heavy and overkilling.
> 
> Fixes: 2aff7a4755be ("mm: Convert page_vma_mapped_walk to work on PFNs")

I think Fixes is a bit much.  There's no bug being fixed here.  This is
just an optimisation.  Is it an important optimisation?  We could put a
bool into page_vma_mapped_walk() so we only have to ask the page whether
it's PMD-mappable once per walk rather than for each VMA.