On 5/7/22 2:19 PM, Oleksandr Tyshchenko wrote:
+
+/*
+ * Handling of free grants:
+ *
+ * Free grants are in a simple list anchored in gnttab_free_head. They are
+ * linked by grant ref, the last element contains GNTTAB_LIST_END. The number
+ * of free entries is stored in gnttab_free_count.
+ * Additionally there is a bitmap of free entries anchored in
+ * gnttab_free_bitmap. This is being used for simplifying allocation of
+ * multiple consecutive grants, which is needed e.g. for support of virtio.
+ * gnttab_last_free is used to add free entries of new frames at the end of
+ * the free list.
+ * gnttab_free_tail_ptr specifies the variable which references the start
If this references the start of the free interval, why is it called gnttab_free_*tail*_ptr?
+ * of consecutive free grants ending with gnttab_last_free. This pointer is
+ * updated in a rather defensive way, in order to avoid performance hits in
+ * hot paths.
+ * All those variables are protected by gnttab_list_lock.
+ */
static int gnttab_free_count;
-static grant_ref_t gnttab_free_head;
+static unsigned int gnttab_size;
+static grant_ref_t gnttab_free_head = GNTTAB_LIST_END;
+static grant_ref_t gnttab_last_free = GNTTAB_LIST_END;
+static grant_ref_t *gnttab_free_tail_ptr;
+static unsigned long *gnttab_free_bitmap;
static DEFINE_SPINLOCK(gnttab_list_lock);
+
struct grant_frames xen_auto_xlat_grant_frames;
static unsigned int xen_gnttab_version;
module_param_named(version, xen_gnttab_version, uint, 0);
@@ -170,16 +194,111 @@ static int get_free_entries(unsigned count)
ref = head = gnttab_free_head;
gnttab_free_count -= count;
- while (count-- > 1)
- head = gnttab_entry(head);
+ while (count--) {
+ bitmap_clear(gnttab_free_bitmap, head, 1);
+ if (gnttab_free_tail_ptr == __gnttab_entry(head))
+ gnttab_free_tail_ptr = &gnttab_free_head;
+ if (count)
+ head = gnttab_entry(head);
+ }
gnttab_free_head = gnttab_entry(head);
gnttab_entry(head) = GNTTAB_LIST_END;
+ if (!gnttab_free_count) {
+ gnttab_last_free = GNTTAB_LIST_END;
+ gnttab_free_tail_ptr = NULL;
+ }
+
spin_unlock_irqrestore(&gnttab_list_lock, flags);
return ref;
}
+static int get_seq_entry_count(void)
+{
+ if (gnttab_last_free == GNTTAB_LIST_END || !gnttab_free_tail_ptr ||
+ *gnttab_free_tail_ptr == GNTTAB_LIST_END)
+ return 0;
+
+ return gnttab_last_free - *gnttab_free_tail_ptr + 1;
+}
+
+/* Rebuilds the free grant list and tries to find count consecutive entries. */
+static int get_free_seq(unsigned int count)
+{
+ int ret = -ENOSPC;
+ unsigned int from, to;
+ grant_ref_t *last;
+
+ gnttab_free_tail_ptr = &gnttab_free_head;
+ last = &gnttab_free_head;
+
+ for (from = find_first_bit(gnttab_free_bitmap, gnttab_size);
+ from < gnttab_size;
+ from = find_next_bit(gnttab_free_bitmap, gnttab_size, to + 1)) {
+ to = find_next_zero_bit(gnttab_free_bitmap, gnttab_size,
+ from + 1);
+ if (ret < 0 && to - from >= count) {
+ ret = from;
+ bitmap_clear(gnttab_free_bitmap, ret, count);
+ from += count;
+ gnttab_free_count -= count;
IIUIC we can have multiple passes over this, meaning that the gnttab_free_count may be decremented more than once. Is that intentional?
+ if (from == to)
+ continue;
+ }
+
+ while (from < to) {
+ *last = from;
+ last = __gnttab_entry(from);
+ gnttab_last_free = from;
+ from++;
+ }
I have been looking at this loop and I can't understand what it is doing ;-( Can you enlighten me?
Attachment:
OpenPGP_0xB0DE9DD628BF132F.asc
Description: OpenPGP public key
Attachment:
OpenPGP_signature
Description: OpenPGP digital signature