Re: [PATCH v20 8/8] soc: mediatek: remove DDP_DOMPONENT_DITHER from enum

From: Matthias Brugger
Date: Fri May 13 2022 - 03:43:00 EST


Hi Chun-Kuang,

On 02/05/2022 00:54, Chun-Kuang Hu wrote:
Hi, Matthias:

Matthias Brugger <matthias.bgg@xxxxxxxxx> 於 2022年4月22日 週五 下午8:42寫道:



On 19/04/2022 11:41, jason-jh.lin wrote:
After mmsys and drm change DITHER enum to DDP_COMPONENT_DITHER0,
mmsys header can remove the useless DDP_COMPONENT_DITHER enum.

Signed-off-by: jason-jh.lin <jason-jh.lin@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Reviewed-by: AngeloGioacchino Del Regno <angelogioacchino.delregno@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>

Acked-by: Matthias Brugger <matthias.bgg@xxxxxxxxx>

Chun-Kuang, I think it would make sense to take that through your tree as it
depends on the previous patches.

I provide you a stable tag so that you can take it:
v5.18-next-vdso0-stable-tag

After I take this tag, I find one checkpatch warning:

WARNING: DT compatible string "mediatek,mt8195-mmsys" appears
un-documented -- check ./Documentation/devicetree/bindings/
#670: FILE: drivers/soc/mediatek/mtk-mmsys.c:390:
+ .compatible = "mediatek,mt8195-mmsys",

I think this tag lost one binding patch, it's better that this tag has
no this warning.


Sorry for the late reply I was sick.
The warning is, because the stable branch misses commit:
https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/matthias.bgg/linux.git/commit/?h=v5.18-next/soc&id=81c5a41d10b968ea89d5f44fe1e5c2fc70289209

So it's not a real issue and will go away once our branches land in upstream.
Is it OK for you to ignore the issue?

Regards,
Matthias

Regards,
Chun-Kuang.


Regards,
Matthias

---
include/linux/soc/mediatek/mtk-mmsys.h | 3 +--
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/include/linux/soc/mediatek/mtk-mmsys.h b/include/linux/soc/mediatek/mtk-mmsys.h
index 59117d970daf..fb719fd1281c 100644
--- a/include/linux/soc/mediatek/mtk-mmsys.h
+++ b/include/linux/soc/mediatek/mtk-mmsys.h
@@ -16,8 +16,7 @@ enum mtk_ddp_comp_id {
DDP_COMPONENT_CCORR,
DDP_COMPONENT_COLOR0,
DDP_COMPONENT_COLOR1,
- DDP_COMPONENT_DITHER,
- DDP_COMPONENT_DITHER0 = DDP_COMPONENT_DITHER,
+ DDP_COMPONENT_DITHER0,
DDP_COMPONENT_DITHER1,
DDP_COMPONENT_DP_INTF0,
DDP_COMPONENT_DP_INTF1,